2,014 karma · joined August 12, 2021
I don't think this is accurate. The Stanford team used LLaMA as base model and added a smaller model on top of it - training the joint model using data (generated from ChatGPT) is what cost $600. Nobody trained a GPT-like model from scratch for $600 - this experiment took advantage of the millions of USD used to train the larger models.
Y no, no soy colombiano pero mi familia si lo es. Soy de otro narco-state.
Also there's money in selling Fentanyl.
Dead customers can't return anyway.
Adderall (fake or legit) is heavily sold illegally and their lacing with Fentanyl is a massive problem already.
Don't know if I buy this. In general, parties pushing for legalization fall more on the left side of the political spectrum. I can also appreciated that libertarians on the far-right think the same (shoehorn theory?) but on the right this is a fringe opinion, unlike in the left.
I get the benefits of the language and would like to see it succeed, but real-world adoption seems to be way below what's imagined here, and the "good for every task" posts give it kind of a cultish vibe that makes me look away.
Excellent point. The pervasiveness of neural nets will require engineers (and really, everyone) to start thinking more probabilistically and establish acceptability thresholds instead of certainty. It's the way of the future.