I am all for free speech, but excusing murder based on race is where I may have to draw the fucking line. Feel free to post this on a board relevant to your hopefuly unique interests.
294 karma · joined August 14, 2017
Your moderation used to keep up, but its just reddit in here now, with slightly better submissions, and a few decent commenters that still occasionally show up to the dump when they see something shiny (their name).
I applaud YCs recent attempts at media, to help raise the bar here on news, but its an uphill battle without ousting the trolls.
Goodnight sweet prince and all that. I may still read you on the shitter, but I feel contributing is more trouble than its worth now. I suspect others may feel the same, but I can obviously only speak for myself.
I am all for free speech, but excusing murder based on race is where I may have to draw the fucking line. Feel free to post this on a board relevant to your hopefuly unique interests.
Edit: I want to be clear. I agree with your point, but observing the obvious roadblock to implementation.
I still call it just shy of '3D'.
I know 3 people with solar, and none are able to use it because of regulations except when completely disconnected from the grid.
The unsaid assumption in your comment, that I disagree with, is that harvesting animals causes anymore suffering than caring for and harvesting plants (in a humane manner, which admittedly, many facotry farms fail at on either side.)
1. Postgrad, with connections around the world, but works airport job. Ramp agent for Delta.
2. Uses new credentials to fly to previously unavailable places immediately.
3. Many mentions of odd behavior, taliored suits, frequent travel to other odd places.
Its a shame he can't know why, but there does seem to be a reason. Assuming there is a security risk to revealing the reason, what would be a better method of limiting disclosure? This seems to be a problem with classification, not skin color or faith.