They are notoriously bad data, and also do not account for the healthy user bias (or the inverse effect).
Of course that doesn't seem to stop researchers from using them to tease out extremely small effect sizes
125 karma · joined March 6, 2015
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dacox; my proof: https://keybase.io/dacox/sigs/KaGMMaVyowMM1tCFTS6uwLYZXy5yuW4AntMpDgHOeLs ]
They are notoriously bad data, and also do not account for the healthy user bias (or the inverse effect).
Of course that doesn't seem to stop researchers from using them to tease out extremely small effect sizes
I know Jupyter exists - but a solution like this with the permissions would be valuable.
However, I live in Vancouver, and when I went to Chicago last year, the tap water was unbelievably bad (tasting). Even the complimentary bottled water in my hotel was bad.
My understanding is they asked everyone they could find in a specific ethnic community if they would volunteer a sample for a kind of dna dragnet.
The killer was related to one of the many people sampled.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SF_Book_Club/comments/30xhj0/three_...
I enjoyed the 3 books. After reading the first one I was intrigued but it didn't blow me away. After reading all of them I am very appreciative of the epic scope, and while the it seemed to have less character development, the ideas more than made up for it.
takes me back!
I was visiting once and saw a plaque on a (condo?) building with the warning.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/b-c-declares-public...
It seems to have made it's way into a variety of drugs, not just heroin, so the demographic of those affected by the deaths has shifted from "junkie" to "recreational user".
Currently, if you receive money it is possible to trace it back to some event, be it a theft, or funds used in some legal or moral grey area.
While these tools will make it easier to launder money, they will remove this "taint".
It is possible and likely that governments will attempt to censor transactions using these "tainted" funds, seriously damaging fungibility.
Many believe that for digital currency to succeed, it must be fungible - the title of the Bitcoin whitepaper is "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System".
From the release notes,
Starting with Tor version 0.2.7.1 it is possible, through Tor's control socket API, to create and destroy 'ephemeral' hidden services programmatically. Bitcoin Core has been updated to make use of this.
This means that if Tor is running (and proper authorization is available), Bitcoin Core automatically creates a hidden service to listen on, without manual configuration. Bitcoin Core will also use Tor automatically to connect to other .onion nodes if the control socket can be successfully opened. This will positively affect the number of available .onion nodes and their usage.
This new feature is enabled by default if Bitcoin Core is listening, and a connection to Tor can be made. It can be configured with the -listenonion, -torcontrol and -torpassword settings. To show verbose debugging information, pass -debug=tor
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-n...