cyansmoker

Can confirm. The bocker code (incl. my modest contributions) was targeted towards showing that the Linux toolbox was available and scriptable.

"Where can I use it? Lando is not meant for production"

Well, off to a great start.

Update 10 minutes later: hmmm I may be starting to understand what Lando is about. So, it's for dev.

Avoid the issue: assign UUIDs to everybody.

Fun! I created a configuration that lays out tiles following the Fibonacci pattern:

https://gist.github.com/Fusion/8ad05ac05948b3397516aa836f0a1...

<ctrl-w>w closed my browser window. Should have seen this one coming.

Adding to what was already said:

- being able to force better design when engineers have to work with multiple services depending on each other (using start-up containers, readiness and liveliness, etc)

I agreed with your comment, until I followed the github link and found that all issues had been removed.

This.

The engines are further away from the plane's fulcrum, and this means that they can now cause the plane to tilt up more efficiently.

While your project seems nice, at this point in time there is little overlap with the concepts found in notion.

Did you publish a roadmap, that would allow us to differentiate it from something more like evernote?

Hi.

You wrote "There is a developer who (I think) works for Docker..."

I believe that you are referring to Jessie Frazelle.

I think ReasonML has a lot going for itself. However, there is so much focus on React and web rendering that it seems that folks do not realize that it can be used as a powerful modern syntax for OCaml. Hence these blogs posts.

Feedback, questions very much welcome!

Take that frustration, increase at least by an order of magnitude and that's your experience implementing native apps.

Still Loving it, though!

Let's forget about how polarizing he is for one minute: I would make the argument that he is the one who made his Twitter feed a public forum when he encouraged people to follow him to get information. It follows that public discourse is now taking place where the tools allow people to respond.

You're being harsh, or we did not read the same piece.

While, towards the end, the OP briefly refers to his efforts as "a startup" I think he was pretty clear that he was mostly trying to get to a point where he could __start__ a startup.

It looks and behaves remarkably like Typora.

What's the story?

Correction:

Innocent version: we did nothing wrong and you are reacting before having even looked at that certificate.

And technical debt keeps accumulating... Even when starting a new product, lots of older code has to be reused.

TL/DR: In this article, the FEE only does what it was created to do: tell us how socialism is a bad idea while liberal capitalism is a good one. No surprise here.

Hello. This is the ministry of bad analogies. Your fine is ready.

Alas: "Docker not available"

All this post shows is that some people are easily impressed. Nothing original or praise worthy to see here.

Hi everyone,

It started as a week-end project for something lacking at my work. I am now bracing myself for your comments! Be gentle :)

Cheers!

Very nice. I am considering giving it a serious try but an important "feature" to me is the ability to export bookmarks in order to avoid vendor lock-in. Any plans for that?

My experience with Twitter:

1. Build a successful product

2. Twitter discontinues dev-friendly policies, product gets shuttered

3. Later, tweet doubts about Twitter's dev "commitment"

4. Tweet gets removed

5. Read yet another horror story about working with Twitter

6. Twitter guys claims that Twitter is "committed"

7. Turns out, previously mentioned horror story tells a different story

8. Rinse, repeat?

This can usually be determined heuristically:

* loaded drivers may be named after the virtualization platform (VMware)

* CPUs can be reported as "Virtual" in /proc/cpuinfo

* Special files in /proc (for instance "vz" for OVZ)

* Kernel name

* etc.

Actually, I tried to email that address but got this:

Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain openhunt.co by mx1.improvmx.com. [192.241.186.150].

The error that the other server returned was: 550 relay not permitted

People think of Fortran and Cobol as similar, due to their age. Put simply: they are not.

You should not.

If anything, this will cause them to send even more emails!

sadly, same