cutemonster

Sometimes people want to interpret what others say in the dumbest way possible, to get something to criticize and seem smart themselves?

Seems you should ask any native American or Australian why there are white people in the USA and Australia

What happened, if I can ask? Re permanently disabled

Pretty likely, I think, it'd be a geographically restricted war.

The countries wouldn't fire nukes against each other's mainlands but maybe against each other's fleets. Pretty likely

And the CEO. And lawmakers

> > will do the minimum work that is required of them

> So... doing their job?

Can also mean working 5 h instead of 8, but not so little so you'd get fired.

That's not doing one's job completely (if paid for working 8 h), just that no one notices.

Wow, thanks for the links!

Orders and rules without explanation or motivation, damages morale and loyalty.

That's a reason to publish any statistics they might have (at least internally)

> It's like getting refused during interview process

Not at all! Those rejected, disappear. But grumpy employees are still there, but less productive

If more people eat hamburgers than vegetables, you'll start saying that that's evidence that hamburgers are more healthy?

I think they'd inject ads during training (too). You and everyone cannot do that; Google can.

> counterproductive for ANY military purpose

Putin uses such people as cannon fodder, meat wave attacks

No it does very much not end up being representative.

> not so intelligent people

They generally won't ever know that the test exists.

Interesting! How many people were you? There weren't any other informal power structures emerging?

He likes flattery too, and this helps him get more of that.

Although I don't think that's the direct reason. But feeling powerful by using his power maybe can be a direct reason for this behavior?

Ok :-) Thanks for explaining. Sounds like a good school

That's a good point.

Maybe you can have all quiet and focused students together in the same classroom?

They might be reading different books, different speed, and have different questions to the teachers. But when they focus and don't interrupt each other, that can be fine?

Noisy students who sabotage for everyone shouldn't be there though.

Grouping students on some combination of learning speed and ability to focus / not disturbing the others. Rather than only learning speed. Might depend on the size of the school (how many students)

And who were the teachers? Did it cost money, how much? How long ago? I guess the students were motivated and disciplined? Who were the other students? Natives, you mean swedes?

But you aren't supposed to choose either or. Instead, you split the students in different groups, different speeds.

So it works ok for everyone. You when you're in a good shape, and also works ok for you when you're in a bad life situation.

I hope everything went mostly okay in the end for you

Interesting. Apparently you don't waive any moral rights, unlike at Reddit. That is, you should still get credited for your work (in theory).

> How they plan to avoid having kids just borrow their parents phones

I think one can say that about alcohol too? How do they plan to avoid kids drinking the wine?

Maybe if the parents leaves knifes, wine and medicine and an unlocked mobile phone where the kids can find it, ... That's a problem that's hard to solve in a phone app?

> frequent reconfirmation maybe?

Maybe popping up face ID camera tests? Can be annoying, I suppose, if you were in the middle of something

> untrustworthy ally who is 100% American first

Trump and Vance first, then their families, then America on a distant third place

I'd say it's not true, not in all aspects. Ukraine for example is better at drone production and defence

If a plane can land anywhere to refuel and takes off again in 10 minutes, the other side needs a fast kill chain to catch the plane.

But if they land on big well known bases, it's much simpler.

Another comment here about slow drone speeds and nest drones:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44918955

And sometimes the other side can destroy all big airbases in a small country.

Could you have lost money if you lost, e.g. having had to pay his legal fees? How much might that have been?

Nice job anyway, and an interesting read. Let's hope he'll be more honest hereafter (although I doubt it)

It'd been nice if the interviewer had informed you in advance that they were going to ask you to write SQL, so you could have prepared? Or you could have saved some time by cancelling? Why don't more companies do that

> covers when someone fails to pay the last 25%

Could it have been that they could use that "reserved" money to pay people's salaries, if the client stopped paying? Then in a way it would have covered? although badly phrased maybe

If there's an article you want to read, and the ToS says that in between reading each paragraph, you must switch to their YouTube channel and look at their ads about cat food for 5 minutes, are your going to do that?

Nowadays the revolutionary movements listen to Twitter and go hunting immigrants instead, the elite has never been safer?

Interesting article! "Blitzhire" he calls it

Or RightWife?