21 karma · joined May 31, 2013
This article isn't nearly as scientific as I hoped it would be.
"""We have created a lifestyle that makes injustice permanent and inescapable.
We have created a world where robots produce robots. Where capital breeds capital with very little need for the Eastenders of the world.
Tell me what will happen when the majority of mankind has become technologically superfluous.
At the same time rebellious with hunger and economically unimportant.
What will then stop a final solution of the world problem?
In People of the Abyss the Eastenders already saw it coming.
They are, Jack London wrote, “encumbrances”, of no use to anyone, not even to themselves. “They clutter the earth with their presence and are better out of the way”."""
Taken from http://www.svenlindqvist.net/text_only.asp?cat=1&lang=2&id=2...
Something like a NASA for non-space software development?
"Weird twitter" is the closest thing I know to "hipster socialist"s, and most that I follow are very critical of the president.
Can you name a "hipster socialist" group that isn't critical of Obama? There are hundreds of Democratic-party affiliated organizations that haven't said a peep about this, but that's because they toe the party line.
>Members of the Nobel family are among the harshest, most persistent critics of the economics prize, and members of the family have repeatedly called for the prize to be abolished or renamed. In 2001, on the 100th anniversery of the Nobel Prizes, four family members published a letter in the Swedish paper Svenska Dagbladet, arguing that the economics prize degrades and cheapens the real Nobel Prizes.
>Most recently, in 2004, three prominent Swedish scientists and members of the Nobel committee published an open letter in a Swedish newspaper savaging the fraudulent “scientific” credentials of the Swedish Central Bank Prize in Economics. “The economics prize diminishes the value of the other Nobel prizes. If the prize is to be kept, it must be broadened in scope and be disassociated with Nobel,” they wrote in the letter, arguing that achievements of most of the economists who win the prize are so abstract and disconnected from the real world as to utterly meaningless.
If you'd like to read about the history of the scam that is the "Nobel Prize in Economics", there's plenty more in this article: http://www.alternet.org/economy/there-no-nobel-prize-economi...
I strongly disagree with this, not just on principle, but also practically. There is always an extreme.