I had the same thought. I don't own the inference here, I just have more granular access to the inference process, right? Seems like the only way I would own inference is if I own the hardware it's running on?
Does this calculation take into account garbage stocks and securities fraud? Perhaps some of the reduction was the result of regulation favorable to the consumer?
And then the AI doesn’t handle the front end caching properly for the 100th time in a row so you edit the owl and nothing changes after you press save.
It’s the thought organization equivalent of the Britany Spears head shaving. It’s a mental breakdown and the person suffering from the mental health issue at its root is processing their behavior by writing about it. It’s mental illness.
It’s hard for me to respond to these kinds of posts with anything other than a dismissive sentiment along the lines of “grats on being rich and playing your rich people sport. I’m sorry you don’t like your rich people sport anymore. Hope your next rich people sport is fun for you.”
As someone who played professional CS in the 1.6-Source era this write up gave me a hearty chuckle. It must be what it feels like when a pro footballer reads a really intense parents write up on u12 tactics.
Same. This film made me believe that it was possible to be cool and find a social group that were all in to tech. I grew up in a really rural area so this revelation of possibility, whether actually practical or not, heavily influenced my trajectory in life and in tech. It’s still one of my most sentimentally favorite movies of all time.