564 karma · joined January 13, 2012
You play many rounds of trying to fairly divvy up piles of loot. Different pieces combine in ways to increase their overall value, as well as each piece having a base level amount of value. As a result the actual act of dividing it fairly becomes complicated, and players will try to influence the outcome in order to maximize their score at the end of the game to win.
Does anyone else find value in what's in an ISO standard?
While encouraging people to not distribute code via Github may mitigate the issue some, the actual issue is how Github has mass-automated the process of violating open source licenses. Github should pay a fine for every suggestion Copilot produces that violates a software license, plain and simple. Don't blame the people that unknowingly upload code to the training dataset.
Take this function the author wrote for converting a list of integers (or strings) into floats
def ints2float(integerlist):
for n in range(0,len(integerlist)):
integerlist[n]=float(integerlist[n])
return integerlist
Using `range(0,len(integerlist))` immediately betrays how the author doesn't understand python. The first arg in `range` is entirely redundant. Mutating the input list like this is also just bad design. If someone has used python for longer than a month, you'd write this with just `[float(i) for i in integerlist]`.Further down in the function `format_captured` you see this attempt at obfuscation:
freqs=ints2float(filter(None,captured[n].split(' '))[2:5])
Why bother with a `filter`? Who hurt you? freqs = ints2float(captured[n].split(' ')[2:5])
That said, the author's implementation in awk does look pretty clean. I'm just peeved that they straw-manned the other language.But it's because of love that grief has meaning.
the suggested words are sometimes not correct, but jesus ducking christ just let me opt in if it’s useful in the moment!
Additionally, by designing it this way you’re guaranteed to only notice when this feature fucks up. If you typed the wrong word and moved on, you never notice. If you typed the right word and moved on, you see auto correct has fucked up after you send the message, or as it’s fucking up because you’ve learned to not trust the keyboard anymore so now you’re constantly rereading the last few words as you’re typing.
Really a shame they put effort into a feature that’s designed to frustrate the user in this way.
A more general example of this is scarcity mindset where the condition of not having enough of something causes someone to be poor at managing that resource [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarcity:_Why_Having_Too_Littl...
Do you know when you've missed something?
Like most things in New York, it comes down to what NYPD officers actually care about enforcing. Per the article:
> But the law doesn’t doesn’t compel law enforcement to issue tickets, nor does it require police cars to be equipped with decibel readers.
tldr: these laws won't do shit then. Officers won't enforce what they aren't required to, this just gets added to the list of offenses they can use to harass someone or tack onto a speeding ticket.
* Inline links everywhere tempting you to click away to a new page, both fracturing your attention as well as being a multiple-second delay between pages
* Images are everywhere, needing to be interpreted by the rendering engine of the ereader either with a simple monochromatic threshold to figure out what parts of the fully color image are black and white, or if you're lucky it has some way to re-process the image through dithering so that it's possible to see what it is
* web layouts always wanting you to have a screen larger than an ereader can support, so you're stuck scrolling back and forth on a tiny screen that already has a miserable refresh rate of once or twice a second.
* the web is an application platform now, the vast majority of its features just not fitting within what an ereader can support
You're all correct, you can easily implement what Gemini does if you make one website that is only text. In fact, you can probably do it better since you don't have to be constrained to gemtext, or constrained to its handful of weekend-project servers for hosting the site, all of which have their own issues.But the thing that keeps drawing me back to is is that while you can easily implement Gemini with HTML and HTTP, it is impossible to implement HTML and HTTP in Gemini. The fact that you can't implement a webapp in Gemini means that if you're browsing pages in Gemini, you get a consistent experience and every site is clean and respectful of the experience (whether the author wanted to respect it or not, they have no choice).
Perhaps the real counter-argument to Gemini is not "why don't website authors just make their websites simpler?" but instead "why don't modern browsers run in 'reader mode' by default?".
When I browse Gemini with Lagrange ( https://gmi.skyjake.fi/lagrange/ ) if you avoid orange links, then you're guaranteed to have a quiet, text-only experience.
This doesn't have to reproduce the entire suite of features that a modern web application offers.
i guess i shouldn't be surprised what a medical experiment is but breaking a pig foot?? ouch