cowsandmilk

?? I got very confused from the start of this article because it is clear that Kohler is one end of the communication from how the product is described and marketed. They’re just stating the data is encrypted between the device and them.

What makes them think they can license Clippy out under the GPL?

CO2 isn’t particulate matter. But more importantly, larger percentages of our electricity is being made without burning things.

In January 2024, I saw it for free at the British Museum and all indications are it is still in the same spot free to view

Pretty sure the same is true of the Louvre: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Egyptian_Antiqui...

I don’t see any evidence the LLM picked the list of books, it instead was used to update/add descriptions of the books and series.

> Obviously, a VM wouldn't be a suitable environment for FileZilla.

Why not? VMs can be given access to the host file systems.

It is also worth noting that Android wasn’t using the standard as well. If they had, this would have been day 0 interoperability for Android phones. Instead, it is a single phone model released a couple months after iOS 26.

That this is being built instead of “Let’s Move Nashville” is a shame.

We’re also still at a point where security is a big question mark. My employer won’t let us hook GenAI up to office 365 or slack, so any project or product management use of GenAI first requires manually importing docs into a database and pointing to that. Efficiency gains are hard to come by when you don’t meet people where their “knowledge” is already stored.

The stories coming out are about convincing high school boys with impressionable brains into committing suicide, not about having intellectual conversations with 80 year olds about whether suicide to avoid gradual mental and physical decline makes sense.

That is 100k vs 130k for Google’s new announcement. I can’t speak as to whether the additional 30k presented new challenges though.

> In theory Apple could've maintained both, but that seems like a waste of development time to me.

They need Airdrop to work with phones who haven’t upgraded, so doesn’t feel like a waste to me. And they already have working AWDL code, so it’s just maintenance, probably not a ton of work.

Good thing they didn’t use two of those units.

S3 Gateway endpoints break cross-region S3 operations. Changing defaults will break customers.

Blog post from less than a week ago on how Cloudflare avoids outages on configuration changes: https://blog.cloudflare.com/finding-the-grain-of-sand-in-a-h...

This has to sting a bit after that post.

The configuration file is updated every five minutes, so clearly they have some past experience where they’ve decided an hour is too long. That said, even a roll out over five minutes can be helpful.

> Why do they do non-critical changes in production before testing in a stage environment?

I guess the noncritical change here was the change to the database? My experience has been a lot of teams do a poor job having a faithful replica of databases in stage environments to expose this type of issue.

That doesn’t help with rolling out updates to the DNS for company.com which is the point here. It’s always DNS because your pre-production smoke tests can’t test your production DNS configuration.

The repetitiveness suggests copying and pasting, not an LLM. I actually find LLMs unlikely to do this.

I’m not sure what that has to do with the comment you’re replying to…

It says existing customers can continue to use the IoT apis, just not new customers.

What is the original publication?

That you think Warren Buffett never worked a day in his life is telling.

Hardly an explanation, what is meant by chaotic media environment?

It’s more than one person at AWS now

That’s nice, but you still shouldn’t be looking into your customer’s containers.

Sure, today, but this was originally released 11 years before OpenOffice was open sourced.

It isn’t clear to me that the OP’s sister-in-law would be responsible to pay these debts and they couldn’t have just allowed payment from the estate. Since insurance had lapsed, I’m assuming the estate was not large.

1. The correction doesn’t invalidate that previous study at all

2. I fail to see how the previous study is an “underpinning” of the new paper. The new paper is a chemistry paper about dissociation of GBCAs in the presence of certain chemicals. Maybe people care because it is a potential explanation for toxicity, but the paper is very focused on the chemistry findings.