Economics is a highly politicized "science" however. Desperate for their pet views self-validating their world dominance, endowed chairs, think tanks, consulting, and special access to finance deals fundamentally skew the practice of economics at an academic level, essentially bribing them into line with oligarchical capitalism / "Reaganomics".
Economists routinely are placed in politically powerful positions, invariably due in large part to their professed views on economics being in line with a dominant political (aka rich cabal or pro-industry) view of economics.
If economics was truly up to snuff, it would be at the forefront of guiding policy to resolve the existential threat our global scale environmental disruption poses to us as a species, which is a direct result of the imperfect economic systems of the world.
But the fundamental problems in economics remain:
- if you can't measure it, it doesn't really exist to economics, especially to academics
- if it isn't going to run out in three months or kill you in three months, it doesn't matter and is ignored by economic study
Of course those two points are slight exaggerations, but if one views the long course of economic study, they become pretty apparent.