61 karma · joined April 12, 2018
Obviously this is anecdotal so take from that what you will. The computer graphics and machine learning communities in academia and industry are small (even with the ML/AI explosion), if this was happening in any significant amount it would be difficult to miss it.
As for research output, I think there are definitely more top-tier papers from Chinese universities than in the past. It still seems like there are more Chinese surnames from Europe and NORAM universities than from Chinese ones. The big names in the field are still in European and NORAM universities.
I wonder how these are articles you linked are counting numbers. It's hard to understand how something like this could be happening completely under the radar.
That is literally not the definition of the "poisoning the well" logical fallacy.
And if you actually did publish in Nature, congrats. You still didn't offer an alternative.
Edit: fixed typo
In general, I prefer papers from peer reviewed venues over the arXiv. Good work does get put on the arXiv though so I can't ignore it completely.
[1] https://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/bc-technology-lea...
In all seriousness though, large pension plans have very diverse portfolios. Ontario teachers used to own 80% of the Toronto Maple Leafs. Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System owns Oxford Properties, which owns and manages the office building I work in (and many others).
Edit: Added "Employees" to OMERS.