We are now considering dropping support for the model family all together. All of their models require significant scrubbing of errant thinking blocks, inner monologues, and it's consuming more engineering resources than it's worth.
278 karma · joined May 5, 2014
We are now considering dropping support for the model family all together. All of their models require significant scrubbing of errant thinking blocks, inner monologues, and it's consuming more engineering resources than it's worth.
Your work history will impact the way you view this issue IMO.
They also wouldn't have to pay to create a new pay package to replace the voided one. This process is surprisingly expensive to create and implement a CEO pay package.
There were more reasons that shareholders voted for the package in the revote, but omitting others as I don't think they are related to financials
It doesn't seem likely the government will have to bail them out.
Today, I think they should do this. It is rare I need to touch the wheel or pedal these days and people should experience it.
I don't know how I will switch to another car brand after this.
Another possible explanation is: A bad economy lead to a lot of layoffs: https://layoffs.fyi/. These layoffs resulted in employees being upset and quitting in addition to layoffs. Now there are a lot of job seekers and fewer jobs making it a bad time to quit.
IDK :shrug:
If a lot of people continue to quit while available jobs continue to decline, the result is fewer people feeling comfortable quitting.
Team of 5 and 1 person is coasting. Get rid of the 1 and you just reduced burn by 20%.
You lose the output of the coasting team member, but that's small to begin with by the scenario's setup.
If you believe coasting is contagious (why am I working so hard when clearly I don't have to like this other person), you could potentially see a boost in output.
Of course, this needs to be weighed against the risk of everyone being upset and leaving after such a decision, but in this market, that risk may be mitigated.
PS. It's really hard to make specific statements about vague hypothetical scenarios :)
If there's a group of people with money and a group with less debating the same issue, I would expect the politician to support the party most likely to make large campaign contributions.
I have no data to support this idea and should not be taken seriously in this context.