By the way, I crave downvotes from humourless Apple devotees.
912 karma · joined November 9, 2009
By the way, I crave downvotes from humourless Apple devotees.
The mind boggles that we're in a situation where arguments like this are put forward. No offence to you specifically Groxx, but... I feel like Apple has exiled us all to crazy land.
Because hey - if you're cool with that, go ahead and get them an Android phone.
Mind you, I also avoided chat roulette...
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=permutations+of+10+item...
That breaks when you try and use it because it's made from chocolate.
...and amazingly enough, I noticed that your chosen 'highlights' include such rants! Deary me, pay attention.
"And you still have to take off your shoes... correct? Eight years to built the A-bomb. Nine years to put a man on the moon. Yet... after 9 years, we are still walking barefoot through airports. Something that would not be permitted in a health care setting... or a restaurant."
Yup. Good 'account'. Very... consistent.
A little bit of knowledge, as they say...
Of course there's no email trail...
The issue is that the human eye is less able to distinguish detail in the blue spectrum, as the article (and a quick test) shows.
(Blimey, I just noticed your first comment got 22 votes! Apparently irrelevant waffle gets upvoted on HN, if it sounds confident)
Pixellating the blue layer - I could perceive at most some 'colour blotching', but no real loss of 'sharpness'
Pixellating the green layer - pixellation was easily visible.
Pixellating the red layer - the effect was somewhere in between.
You should give it a try. Here's my test Paint.NET image file with the layers all set up for you:
"Facebook - we protect your contacts, so unscrupulous websites can't spam them like we do."
You're over-generalising; I reckon there are plenty of idiots in Al-Quaeda.
From your last sentence, I can see you are no stranger to making snap judgements without all the details. ;)
J
Ω is a valid variable name in C#. (But Ω₀ isn't).