combat-banana

It is entirely irrelevant because cell phone companies add “analytics” (spyware) as part of their firmware stack… which Google and anyone else cannot block.

Use no cell towers or agree to be tracked. Lol.

Because it is doing it within a closed time series that is located in the past. Like predicting what the weather was yesterday in areas with no radar. Cool, and useless.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f3f

I think we agree: in my personal context it is an anecdote but let’s use rumor in this context instead. :)

Not really. Different as in “BBQ chicken pizza” vs. “pepperoni pizza”.

Careful with the terminology there. They do not “handle” the states but rather “access” or “read” them: moreover the qubits read are not processed along any probability vector which means they are scraping inherently junk data.

By analogy: imagine you want to make an aimbot to shoot people in an online FPS video game. You need your aimbot to calculate not only the vector to shoot at (our game has bullet drop and bullet objects, not hitscan weapons) but also to calculate for the opponent’s motion.

The way people at Google are doing it now, they look at a map of where the players are where when the game starts and try to ammo dump it… with no one there. Lol.

Rumor would mean that I don’t have personal knowledge. I do. It is not a rumor, but rather an anecdote, and the source will remain unknown and unposted. I appreciate your reply.

It is not possible to use entanglement states to process quantum data. More failed projects from supposed “the smartest people”— I am not impressed.

I also further disagree they are producing anything other than annealed states even if using some other methodology.

Food analogy: like saying you are making a “revolutionary new pasta” which is an egg noodle or a rice noodle as opposed to a flour noodle. Not impressive.

Those are not quantum computers they are classical computers that have been enabled to process data matrices. Not the same as moving amplitudes directly.

It’s an anecdote. No source.

Anecdotally I only know of one team on Earth capable of doing it “properly”. They are working with Grigori Perelman on the system and it is made of cheap materials, almost intentionally, like a snub in the face of rich companies.

I know of no major research companies that have begun on the same line of research.

Did you write this? Wow! I’m going to be going through your guide with a friend! If I can think of anything helpful to add based on the process I will let you know!

“ In case we needed more evidence that putting dynamic code between hyperlinks from one page to another, add this to the pile...”

If you add “is a bad idea” after another so that it reads: “ In case we needed more evidence that putting dynamic code between hyperlinks from one page to another is a bad idea, add this to the pile...”

Otherwise the sentence isn’t saying anything as it is worded. Sorry if I am being mistaken here.

This is an above satisfactory article.

It’s very simple depending upon your context. (God’s object)

I wonder if this will lead to co-applications with https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_trap (s)

“ In case we needed more evidence that putting dynamic code between hyperlinks from one page to another, add this to the pile...”

This sentence doesn’t seem to be complete. What did you mean?