column

Range extender's range extender when ?

Stocks are ownership in a company, they provide you info disclosed to shareholders, possibly voting rights, and dividends. It's not like the rover provides a passive income.

haters gonna hate...

There's a typo right at the beginning of your paper's page: exsiting

I didn't find a way to download the mesh once generated. Is that option not available at all?

google docs already logs every keystroke

bait and switch, you let the users get used to the service without ads and find value then slam the ban hammer to make the whales switch to premium

If it's a sequel and Brad Pitt was in the first movie and you use trickery to make people think he's in the second movie, there's a case. See Crispin Glover, the dad from Back to the future, which was NOT the upside-down dad in BTTF2. They settled for 760k USD.

It's not a question of owning all voices that sound like her, it's a question of "are customers deceived into thinking it is her" and "does it affect SJ negatively to be associated with this sound alike" when her income comes partly from her distinctive voice (much like Morgan Freeman). Sam Altman tweeting "Her" right before the announcements is what builds the case for SJ.

Imagine we hired a Leo Messi look alike and made him play football badly or something worse, if viewers can clearly tell it's not him it falls under parody but if we use camera trickery to keep a fooling doubt, we could be in legal trouble.

This is such an ignorant take. The default wallpaper is seen by millions if not billions of people. Many never change it. It's an important part of the branding. The total cost of the shoot, including equipment, salaries, the studio, etc. is NOTHING to Microsoft and its marketing budget. It's not like they had to prioritize this over anything else, they are printing money left and right, they are a trillion dollar company and the default wallpaper is a key aspect of how people see their core product, Windows. It would be disastrous of them to ship with a sub-par wallpaper and in what world would the money "saved" would make a difference to "build a better product"?

I've tried it on my laptop and it is about as slow/fast as xtts. But as far as I can there's no way of keeping a consistent voice from generation to generation. If so, I don't really get the appeal. If there was a way to get consistent, then that's great for NPCs.

For anybody else not in the know : "Contra proferentem is a legal principle that suggests when there is ambiguity in the terms of a contract, the ambiguity should be resolved against the party that drafted the contract."

Microsoft says they don't train on Office 365 customer data. Maybe you don't believe them, but that's what they say.

When you pay for a service, public or private, you are still dealing with humans that are not your slaves.So be kind and you'll get a better time or be entitled and you'll go to the bottom of the pile.

Unfortunately BitDefender (corporate) blocks llamafile as a ransomware "atc.heur.crypt" and it seems there is no workaround. :(

If you are a customer of kagi.com, I found their summarizer to be a real time saver.

just "decimal" works too

Automatically take a screenshot and feed it to https://github.com/vikhyat/moondream or similar? Doable. But while very impressive, the results are a bit of mixed bag (some hallucinations)

it seems it does not support CPU only

I kind of disagree. It's not "user friendly" but it is very descriptive. They are codenames afterall. Take "dolphin-2.6-mistral-7b-dpo-laser" for instance : with a little LLM background knowledge, just from the name you know it is a 7 billion parameters model based on Mistral, with a filtered dataset to remove alignment and bias (dolphin), version 2.6 and using the techniques described in the Direct Preference Optimization (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18290.pdf) and Laser (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.13558.pdf) papers to improve its output.

What do you mean, "that's *probably* impossible" to make 6 babies from the same mother in a single year? Takes about 9 months to output a human, you know?

140 USD for a gimmick case? waaay overpriced

What are your findings?

That's twice the average salary of an experienced "regular" software developer in France.

This is for convenience. You can also download a 4.45Mb executable (llamafile-server-0.1) and pass any GGUF model as an argument.

> llamafile-server-0.1 -m llama-2-13b.Q8_0.gguf

https://github.com/Mozilla-Ocho/llamafile/releases/tag/0.1

"especially prior to an election cycle"

It looks like you are referring to the USA elections.

1. humanity != USA

2. USA are in a constant election cycle

3. there are always elections coming around the world, so it's never a good time

You can always check https://status.openai.com/ Anyway it works OK here

3.5 is a weak model that is only good at informal conversation. When people talk about using ChatGPT and its potential (programming, vision, etc.) they talk about GPT-4. If you don't want to pay, you should use Bing Chat for your comparison. 3.5 would not be worth $20 a month but GPT-4 is.

no source code = no download.

Pardon my French but this is the exact same of bullshit pseudo-philosophical semantic non-arguments we hear from jordan peterson (please watch the Some More News video about him). "What even are words?"