For many cases this is more than enough to solve some hard problems well enough.
63 karma · joined April 18, 2013
For many cases this is more than enough to solve some hard problems well enough.
I don’t think it’s possible to prove; feels like a philosophical question.
A lot of us are simply interested in promoting and continuing to evolve and understand that well-reasoned ideology. We feel its application can improve the human condition.
Not saying the system doesn’t apply this declaratively, but I find it difficult to intuit the above is checking for a state and applying changes only if necessary.
If these magnets are used incorrectly, why should the responsibility for that not be the users?
I’m a self-taught dropout - I learned how to do this to the detriment of other endeavors including my assigned coursework (which happened to be for another degree).
It sounds like you’re not doing this because you’re driven to. That’s fine, but you’ll probably struggle doing it on your own. I’m guessing those self-taught folks were just more inclined to the field.
It’s possible to “shrink” a stamp by pressing onto wet clay, firing, and then repeating the process multiple times (clay will reduce after firing).
I wonder if this could have been etched or pressed, potentially with a chemical process?
Very rare and impossible are nearly equivalent wrt policies that broadly and significantly impact personal health and liberty.
We're assuming the crash in March was due to COVID - though there's no proof this was the case. This very much could have been a correction to more realistic valuation.
> So you're saying "this time is different." Let's see how that plays out.
Agree here - I think we're in for an interesting year. We may have amplified the upswing dynamics with Fed action, but I'm pretty sure we'll see amplified downswings, as a result.
And, since he’s not wrong or right - just exploring possibilities and being imaginative, I think it’s pretty cool.
It’s good that it stalls in that condition, IMO. I’d expect unaligned moves in Congress to cause social strife.
Can we remedy things at a lower level before we push a fix through and apply it to half the country that doesn’t want it?
I feel like this is a useful prioritization mechanic within the structure of government.
I like the concept of this long term allowing me to specify a single url and toggle the environment of the API I'm hitting from a remote, secure web interface. What sort of uptime and scaling guarantees do you intend to provide?
It's a suite of tools that focus around declarative configuration of various project environments. For instance, the Stubfile.json can contain the references to your staging and production servers, and you can swap your system to view either staging or production from the command line. Additionally it supports stub packages, so you could theoretically write a GitHub API stub (think pre-configured and packaged webmock stubs) and distribute to other devs over github.
My company's building this out to assist with dev/QA and a migration to docker, so there's some semblance of a team.
I fear this is what we can expect in the future was well. At least give us the names of the folks you're bringing in to make this thing work! This is the reason those of us in the US were doubtful of this project in the first place - not a single one of my peers expected this site to stay up (we've all got experience with media company advertisement efforts, so we know what it means to go from zero to millions).
As an aside - spewing this "with over 19 million unique visits to date to HealthCare.gov– confirms that the American people are looking for quality, affordable health coverage, and want to find it online" is ridiculous - it confirms only that Americans are now legally obligated to look for health coverage... There's more, but instead of pissing myself off further I'm just going to hit 'reply' and shrug away to my corner of indifference for the day.