341 karma · joined March 30, 2011
As someone living in Iowa, I can confirm this is true and also less effective. I bank at Chase because a straight forward "no" or clear process is so much more efficient and effective than a "nice person trying to help". People in Iowa hate that truth, but waste so much time listening and passing people around to solve a problem that should be resolved with a clear answer.
It sounds like there's an opportunity here for someone to create (yet another?) tech company that manages this difficult problem. PornHub, gambling sites and other folks that need to verify age then pay you to do it! Laws like this are just a cost of doing business. Pass the cost of verification onto the consumers in Utah. If consumers don't like they can change the law or learn how to setup a VPN.
Doesn't this solve the problem? PornHub keeps their margins and people still have their freedom. If a kid really wants to look at porn, they'll at least have to be able to fund it or learn some valuable technical skills.
When I was in Omsk I listened to a man testify that the Russian Orthodox church was good because Father Oleg the local priest had a man killed because he was trying to collect a debt on a member of the church.
Moroni 10
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/mo...
What I think too many very intelligent people forget is that faith and knowledge are two different things. But, if you want to start a project, a business, or a relationship... You need both. One feeds the other.
I choose never to undermine the faith of others because it is those strong beliefs and acts of faith that created light bulbs, assembly lines, search engines, massive online book stores and put us in the moon again and again. Faith is pretty powerful stuff
Hebrews 11
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/nt/heb/...
I think this is what Jesus was teaching with the "Good Samaritan" parable:
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/nt/luke...
And, I think a masculine response to sympathy/empathy has never been expressed more (worst) than in the classic movie Funny Face with Audrey Hepburn and Fred Astaire... the scene probably doesn't play as well as it did back in 1957.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FXW2S_KU4o
I agree this is a skill to develop if you really want to excel at product management, planning, user research, education, medicine... anywhere you need to account for the human condition.
Are we concerned that an AI would begin to spread like a digital virus? That seems unlikely to me, but maybe it could find ways to create a self-prepreservation duplicate of itself... Maybe. So what would keep us from just turning the switch off if we find that an AI is doing more than what we're asking it to do? Again, I feel like I'm either being naive about this or I don't really understand the threat of an AI beyond the control that humans still have on the systems that govern it.
This is the point we have to help people understand and I'm not sure AI will catch up with this anytime soon; questions are the key to knowledge and intelligence. I haven't seen an AI ask interesting questions. Maybe it's possible with the right training set and weighting of factors to encourage enquiry, but this will be a gap in AI's ability for at least the near term.
Less affluent and people with no kids are using their time elsewhere, which sounds like people are doing more of what they want and less time traffic.