I mean what kind of a catastrophe are we talking about? Nuclear holocaust? The end of humanity?
(Famous last words...)
7,248 karma · joined March 13, 2014
I mean what kind of a catastrophe are we talking about? Nuclear holocaust? The end of humanity?
(Famous last words...)
Sometimes I respond to my interlocutor by naming the emotion they're expressing, not necessarily directly ("oh you're angry!?") but rather stuff like "oh it must be infuriating what happened!"
I find people do respond positively to that, and that it opens a deeper connection.
There's the practice of Non Violent Communication [1], which has inspired me, though I'm not a zealous follower of the technique. It can seem condescending at the hands of the wrong person.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication
Edit: to me this is not about validation. It's about being more attuned to what the other person's going through. It's about empathy and compassion.
In fact what happened is those energy sources kept being piled on top of one another. Today we consume more wood coal and fossils than ever before. [1]
[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-energy-substitutio...
Using ractors as actors in the Erlang genserver sense is not really feasible. They're too heavy, you're not going to start up thousands of them.
Ractors are an interesting feature, with maybe some specific applications related to data processing, but they're still highly experimental and have yet to be understood and embraced by the Ruby community.
/s
Some predictions:
- The 2025 US budget will increase compared to 2024. - The 2025 US budget deficit will increase compared to 2024. - At the end of 2025 the US national debt will have increased compared to 1/1/25.
On a moral level, watching how tech bros are sucking it up to Trump/Musk and how their companies are betting all their chips on the AI roulette, it all seems related.
But for the soil to be really alive, lots of plants must be planted, in a polyculture context. It's the photosynthesis that feeds the soil's fauna, which then support the plants, increase fertility and carbon content.
I mean it is kinda obvious that the system in western democracies is structurally flawed such that there's a selection bias for crooks and incompetent assholes (lobbying, i.e. legalized bribery), but still, how come the bad guys always seem to win? Or is this just a symptom of a deeper malady of modern society?