2,356 karma · joined January 25, 2020
Besides the office in Manhattan, I'm sure you mean?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1323316...
Page 8.
They operated an office in Manhattan and had US customers.
No, but federal jobs usually get dozens or hundreds of applicants. Removing felons is usually one of the first filters they use to narrow the field.
It makes the default subreddits totally unusable imo. Sometimes I just want to see funny pictures, not be lectured to about why I'm a racist or how my unconscious biases blah blah blah.
> The executive in question, Eric Alexander, the president of business in the Asia Pacific, then showed the medical records to Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and SVP Emil Michael. In addition, numerous executives at the car-hailing company were either told about the records or shown them.
https://www.vox.com/2017/6/7/15754316/uber-executive-india-a...
[1] https://www.statista.com/chart/9358/us-gdp-by-state-and-regi...
Of course people will come out of the woodwork to talk about how "my very existence is political" or some other nonsense. Ie. exactly the kind of thing I'm glad Coinbase is banning at work.
> We won’t:
> Debate causes or political candidates internally when unrelated to our mission
> Expect the company to represent our personal beliefs externally
> Assume negative intent, or not have each others back
> Take on activism outside of our core mission at work
I wish more companies would take this position. I go to work to build great things and work with great people, not to talk about identity or partisan politics.
Linking as a footnote because it's NSFW and hard to watch. They basically crush the life out this guy then joke as he lays naked and dead in the street.
Yes, very clear. Skim the indictment a bit, it goes into some detail re: their communication.
Is this what Assange is accused of doing?
1. Receiving a password hash from Manning
2. Telling Manning he'll try to crack it
3. Following up asking for more info about it (related usernames or something)
4. Never actually cracking it and no further action
Does anyone have any more specifics on what Assange actually did here to break the law? The indictment is pretty vague on this and it seems to be the central issue.
[1] https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1289641/downl... (page 9)
I'm on the younger side for HN. In my social circles replying to something with either just '?' or just a leading '?' is pretty aggressive and rude.
It's either to take the top students, bar none, or it is to educate and uplift poorer students (economically and educationally). Mixing these two doesn't work.
I usually see the headline and go to youtube to find the video.
Is this what Assange is accused of doing?
1. Receiving a password hash from Manning
2. Telling Manning he'll try to crack it
3. Following up asking for more info about it (related usernames or something)
4. Never actually cracking it and no further action
Does anyone have any more specifics on what Assange actually did here to break the law? The indictment is pretty vague on this and it seems to be the central issue.
[1] https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1289641/downl... (page 9)
I do both and this site looks fine, like any other article online.