156 karma · joined June 2, 2014
91k @ 369px × 4275px https://www.fcc.gov/sites/all/themes/fcc/images/icons-2x-s4a...
461k @ 2129px × 1571px https://www.fcc.gov/sites/all/themes/fcc/images/bg-pattern-h...
493k @ 2128px × 1593px https://www.fcc.gov/sites/all/themes/fcc/images/bg-pattern-g...
585k @ 2128px × 3740px https://www.fcc.gov/sites/all/themes/fcc/images/icons-sa0dc2...
Let's say an expensive self-driving car is around $100,000 new, even buying that car used 3 years later would be out of the budget for many people.
How long have you been there so far?
I only pay for internet access, I don't use their cable TV or telephone offerings. Internet alone is about $80/month. I just ran a speed test and I get 14.1Mbps down & 8.6Mbps up. I forget which speed tier I'm paying for, but I know I'm paying for much more than that! Ugh...
The marketing team was surprised to learn how big the file was since the outsourced team "ensured" them that the new website would be lightweight. Oh well... Now the video has been reduced to a 16MB at 720p, which is still ludicrous to me, but they just really like having the video on the home page more than they want a truly lightweight page.
And to be fair, the video does not load when viewed on a mobile device, so at least there's that.
Even then, how many watch users browse the web on their watch? (serious question, I don't have a smart watch) - Is it a bad experience right now because websites aren't optimised for round displays?
The story goes that you are supposed to make an obvious mistake, like a spelling error, on purpose. This will fulfill the clients' need to provide a critique and allow good designs to remain an option.
it's dumb, but i think that should work. You will need to have QuickTime installed though, I don't think there's a way around that.