111 karma · joined August 13, 2015
I've used and developed on X11 since 1990. I'm well aware of its numerous limitations and I'm glad new technology such as Wayland is being developed to replace it. But it wasn't "a mistake".
Secondly, with the word "services" you're implying that the users are whores.
Thirdly, there are an infinite number of ways that Grindr could protect its users through the design of their app: from purely technical measures such as end-to-end encryption, or through careful informed consent about shared data and protection of people who are legally or functionally incapable of such consent.
But from your statements you just want to blame the users because you disapprove of them. I'm sure you can do better than that.
The entire X11 system was "a mistake". Got it, we should have stuck to 7-bit text on a VT-100 because that was utter perfection.
With that compelling intro I lost any interest in any other arguments the author presented.
That's my favorite part.
It's a bait and switch and it's a sellout, which is pretty hilarious: a scam and a betrayal. And why not?
But everything else eventually caught up and surpassed the Ruby/Rails ecosystem on the requirements->deployment pipeline, and did a lot of other things better.
I have a real soft spot for Ruby but I won't be back.
But then Spain didn't tell drivers from all over Europe that they are undesirable and unwanted, create a "hostile environment" for them and their families, and then dissolve our trading relationship with our most important partners.
Drivers also don't enjoy gambling with uncertain paperwork, peeing in bottles and crapping next to hedgerows as they wait for endless border queues, so why would they choose those routes when instead they can drive somewhere else where they're not hated, resented and officially unwelcome?