RIP
806 karma · joined May 24, 2012
RIP
What is the Venn overlap between web3 promoters and techno-libertarians?
In other words, is web3 first and foremost a political movement driven by political beliefs and values?
I would dispute this. At that time, search was not gamed the way it is now, you didn't have to wade through millions of terrible low quality SEO bs to find the nuggets you're looking for.
After 2017 I'll never use US-east-1 again. Hell... I should have learned that particular lesson in 2011 but it took two catastrophic failures for me to figure it out.
There are numerous threads here on HN covering the topic "why does US-east-1 suck so hard."
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13756082 is just one example.
I know it's cheap but seriously... not worth it. Many of us have the scars to prove this.
My boss told me, "just assume they know the answer to any question they ask and tell the truth, regardless of what it is."
Then it was just "right place, right time."
First startup was acquired after Series A by a publicly traded company. Second startup was bootstrapped by the founding team of the first startup and was acquired by a publicly traded company. Third startup was acquired after the Series A by a competitor. Fourth startup was acquired after the Series B by a publicly traded company.
I had incredible co-founders and worked with some amazing teams. I only had one bad investor and was lucky enough to work with some incredible board members. But most of all, I had incredible timing and I embraced the grind.
It's easy to make excuses for why you can't start a company and in fact there are a million great reasons why you should never do so. Starting a company is a terrible decision from a purely rational or financial perspective.
But don't act like it's not possible unless you're rich. That's just not true.
Ouch baby.
I'd say no. It doesn't include the spatial computing aspects. You can say it was a precursor to the metaverse, but by the earliest definitions (Snowcrash et al), the metaverse has to be a replacement for the reality around you which encompasses all your senses.
That might be the saddest thing I've ever read, and perhaps the first time I've ever felt sympathy towards Mark Zuckerberg.
That's the wrong question.
The right question is "how many FB users would accept a free headset that advertisers paid for in exchange for access to your data and exclusive rights to place ads in front of you?"