76 karma · joined July 20, 2018
According to a Gallup survey, only 26% of employees believe that the feedback they receive helps them to do a better job. This is because appraisals and development discussions often lack the ‘tough’ content that would be helpful for their development.
Research from the Harvard Business Review supports this. They report that while 72% of employees consider leaders providing critical feedback to be important for their development, only 5% of them believe that their managers actually share such feedback with them.
I personally know of:
- Transition Technology - https://ttpsc.com - huge organization, I don't know if they will want to work with someone small;
- Inwedo - https://inwedo.com/ - this company is closest to my heart;
- Liki Mobile - https://likims.com/pl - I thought of them because you mentioned a mobile app;
- Fabrity - https://fabrity.com/ - I used to work with them, but it's hard for me to say anything concrete after so many years;
If you have any questions, let me know.
7 goals: - People come first and should be at the heart of the business - Areas of responsibility are better than delegation - Support structure as a culture necessary for an organisation to thrive - Enterprise processes the solution to many ills - Development paths that value knowledge, experience and skills - Self-directed employee development is the future of organisations - Transparent meetings and speaking to the whole company have many benefits
Anyway, today on Hackernews there was a post about abandoning github because developer doesn't want Copilot to learn from his code.
I know a lot of people who are asking themselves the same question as me. How do not fed the GPT chat with my blog posts in the future. Suppose someone publishes unique data and want it to be available for humans, not machines.
In addition, we have something in the law like copyright and we should be able to decide whether our code, texts, graphics, can be copied and processed in someone else's software.
In the meantime, I found two solutions: https://www.seroundtable.com/chatgpt-bot-user-agent-35131.ht... https://shortbuzz.in/blog/shortbuzz.in/how-to-block-openai-c...
But for now I wanted to focus on the texts.
-- Assuming that we should launch many pilot projects, let’s consider for which of them it is possible to build minimally viable products – and then try (where possible) to use low-code and no-code tools. With these, we can get less technical people prototyping quickly (of course, more complex integration pieces may still require the help of an engineer). Thanks to the fast implementation, managers or people responsible for the functioning of the process in the company are able (within a few weeks) to check and analyze the sense of an idea. They can test it in a natural environment, and if everything works, they can create a dedicated solution developed by an experienced team. --
One of my close friends, whom I advise in the field of digitization, owns a factory. I can't convince him for anything to try this approach, which I think is absolutely right. The client believes that only their IT department and CTO can change anything in automation. Or only they can be responsible for data analysis. How to change this, how to convince him?