1,210 karma · joined December 4, 2009
"Jugaad": http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/01/jugaad_a_new_growth_formula_...
That's your job. :)
Put it out there, be as succinct as you can, and tweak it along the way. No shortcuts here.
Airing out potentially confidential information just to spite someone reeks of immaturity. Very bad move on Oracle's part.
I'm looking for some genuine, constructive feedback.
I came up with judg.me because I noticed how most of us often wonder not about how "hot" we look, but how others perceive us. E.g. how differently would you be perceived if you had a faux hawk as opposed to being bald? Do those glasses make you look more "nerdy"? Does having popped collars really make you look like a douchebag? judg.me lets you find out (and the truth could be a little hard to digest!).
In the interest of usability, users can be judged on only 2 scales: the social scale (introvert<->extrovert) and the intellectual scale (dense<->smart). Users judge you based on how sociable and intellectual they think you are.
I'd appreciate any comments or feedback. Thanks.
judg.me lets users judge others, not on how attractive they look, but on their perceived social and intellectual capacities.
In the interest of usability, users can currently be judged on only 2 scales (or "continuums"): the social scale (introvert->extrovert) and the intellectual scale (dense->smart). Users judge you based on how sociable and intellectual they think you are.
I'd appreciate any comments or feedback. Thanks.
Spot on. Focus on nothing else but this initially. Remember Carol Bartz's answer to "What is Yahoo?"?
"What is Yahoo? Listen Yahoo is a great company that is very, very strong
in content for its users, uses amazing technology to serve up what increasingly
we think is going to be the web of one. For instance, on our today module in the
front page, every 5 minutes we have 32,000 different variations of that module.
So you don’t even know what I’m seeing in fact we serve a million different front
page modules a day and that’s just through content optimization. And that’s just
the beginning. Customized because we know the things you’re interested in. Maybe
you don’t like light entertainment maybe you like a certain sports team, etc. And
our click through rate went up twice. So the point is, people come to us to find
out what is going on with the world in a very nice quick fashion to do their
communications, email, messanger, check-in on their teens. We all know about
Yahoo finance. It’s a places where you can just get it together. It’s collated
for you, it’s all the things as you’re moving, you can even get your social
information there. Everybody moves through many websites in a day, Yahoo is one
they always stop at."
Ouch.Link: http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/28/ok-seriously-what-is-yahoo/
Not that I'm defending or promoting AB&B, but staying at someone's home as opposed to a hotel would obviously need more stringent requirements (background checks etc) that I'm sure most people wouldn't mind going through.
If all YC (and non-YC) startups describe what they do in the title in 10 words or less, everybody wins.
I'm not talking about "firehose people" - my point is, it would be great if I could see (posts from Y) > (posts from X) > (posts from Scoble), even if they're all in the same Circle. Currently, everyone inside a Circle is given the same weight.
Certain folks tend to dominate or flood my Twitter or Google+ stream - but muting/blocking/unfollowing them is not really an option.
From a usability point of view, it would be great to have a slider or a similar control that will allow me to tweak how often Person X's posts are displayed in my stream. Everyone in a Circle is not equally important.
It would be great if we could simply subscribe to public Circles (haven't played around with G+ enough to know if such an option exists in the first place), as opposed to having to add people one by one.
Many thanks.
You can. Those with advanced degrees should be viewed as "desirable" immigrants.