489 karma · joined October 18, 2012
In the early days LC invested their own capital more heavily to make sure loans were fully funded, and to ensure the community was active enough.
This is why they have "funded_amnt" and "funded_amnt_inv" to denote how much of the loan was funded by investors vs. internally.
"LendingClub doesn't loan out its own capital and collects fees of loans that are originated on its platform from both individuals and more sophisticated investors alike."
Lending Club owns a subsidiary fund that invests in the platform as well.
Investors should be aware that LC is both a platform, and an investor in it's own platform which, if not monitored closely, can be potentially dangerous.
[Source] http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lending-club-announc...
Brew Dogs. http://tv.esquire.com/shows/brew-dogs
While trying to learn more about white collar crime, I uncovered a website, sharesleuth.com. The owner was writing stories on stock fraud/white collar crime, and we exchanged a few emails.
A few weeks later I found out Mark Cuban was backing him, and short selling the companies he found to be fraudulent. Cuban was doing this for two reasons: #1 To bring attention to white collar crime and #2 If the SEC wasn't going to shut down the companies, he might as well make money while doing it...inevitably bringing it back to #1. It looks like he was successful in drawing their attention.
A previous Wired article on Sharesleuth: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-10/mf_shares...
X-post from HN thread on the pump and dump I uncovered: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5236372
One thing people forget is that there are over 14,000 banks and credit unions across the country, not including the top 10. The challenges of regional FIs is dramatically different than that of large organizations. (Note, most comments on HN are from large banking backgrounds, very few from the other 14,000).
FWIW, the two themes I have seen emerge are:
1) Regional banks outsource a lot of their technology, often times leaving them with the inability to quickly adapt.
2) The regulatory environment drives technology and has created a gun shy approach to tech.
3) Most CEOs of banks and credit unions tend to have some type of finance background as opposed to technology.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/education-debt-mini...
...and the US Government is making more on student loan interest than Exxon profits.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/obama-student-loans...
I've also observed that when comparing a group of loans, those with homes were almost as likely to default on a loan as those without homes and it had minimal impact despite most people assuming that having a home makes a person "more stable." I have definitely seen many situations where a home becomes the priority over life, family and personal finances as well.
On the flip side, this argument also assumes that if consumers get better jobs, make more money, etc. that they'll actually save and/or invest more and the unfortunate reality is that most people just tend to increase their rate of consumption proportionately to their income/bonus increase.
So the nature of having a forced savings plan through a mortgage payment requires them to put money away yet still limiting their ability to move or take better positions.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/05/12/2-tr...
In this case, if they don't obtain the video they are simply going to donate $200k to a charity that they will "figure out what that is later if it comes to it."
The OP also said it was based on 5+ years worth of data which probably means it is less about gas price fluctuations and more about buying habits.
However, I'd rather have too much information and be able to determine what is helpful myself at that point in time than to have someone choose to provide less information.
Thought it was ironic to find out from a person vs. Google Alerts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_AT%26T
You Canadians have it figured out, your banking system seems far more efficient with larger regional institutions.
Pros: Capital would be lent more efficiently as region's know their markets/customers better. Generally better service. Possibly fewer loan losses due to knowing the local market better.
Cons: The largest drawback is that of security, as many regional banks/credit unions are amazingly insecure. Cost to the consumer would probably go up slightly in the form of higher loan rates and lower savings rates, but it could easily be argued large banks aren't distributing these savings anyway.
The most amazing piece I've seen was when TARP money was given to the banking industry with the goal of it being lent to consumers and businesses. Instead the capital was used to fuel M&A within the banking industry which ultimately lead to fewer jobs.
This happened. The company paid exorbitant fees for PR and news services to hype the stock with announcements that were't real in the build up period.
>This line set off alarms because I've experienced, first hand, how difficult it is to get information about a Cayman holding company or trust in person, let alone remotely, let alone before 2008.
I didn't interface with any of the Cayman organizations directly. What made it difficult? Just paper trails, continual mailed notices etc?
>If this is true, the class action settlement is illegal - you are not allowed to take payouts from a fraudulent scheme.
Not a lawyer, however the company shut down just before the SEC investigation was complete, investors settled the lawsuit before fraud was proven, and evidence dismissed before it could show up in public records…it is very possible.
As a high frequency trader I’m sure you’re very familiar and aware of how plausible and possible these things are.
Some additional points addressing various comments and themes:
>I’m glad there is additional dialogue about investor due diligence. Others are absolutely right that if you’re going to invest in a company it is up to you to do your own due diligence. Go visit the company, speak with customers, get references.
>I lost no money in this process and was simply looking out for the interests of a friend and investor.
>The original individual referenced counter sued the State of Idaho for defamation, after the State originally filed suit against him years ago. Obviously the State has far greater resources than I do. As much as I’d like to throw up names, links etc. there is a very real downside and unfortunately is not something I’m willing to do at this time publicly. If some enterprising investigative journalist wanted to take the reins I’d be open to helping them find out information on their own.
>This was posted on Blogger because I didn't want it distracting from other things I’m working on. I also don’t think my personal site would have been able to handle the traffic.
>There are legitimate examples of reverse mergers and stocks that aren't traded on major exchanges. However, the smaller the stock the more chance for fraud, fewer checks etc.
>International incorporation is a regular practice and employed by companies such as Apple and Facebook. However the Cayman Islands are simultaneously a hot bed for fraudulent activity (interestingly as are Vancouver, B.C. and Boca Raton, Florida).
http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-funneled-nearly-half...
As for Unicorns and sniff tests, if you don’t believe it, that's ok. I wouldn't have believed it either. It's good you're exercising your right to question things which was the basis of the post.
For example, since then inter-agency task forces have been established, media has begun covering the topics, books have been written and movies produced. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Job_(film)
The general awareness is much higher (despite little action taken).
To clarify, Yuri Milner was not an investor in the company referenced.