brutal_chaos_

A woman in Iran would not be allowed to own a gun. Maybe men, if any people. We have cops cuffing you, throwing you in the back of their car, and leaving said car on train tracks to be hit by an on coming train (see Colorado police video gaining traction in the news). The cops (morality police) in Iran killed the poor woman for indecency. The cops in the US still act egregiously and we have guns. Guns will not help.

And would be eventually priced out by something like this.

I have parents, neither are in the tech sector, that believe this. I would say a fair number of people outside of tech believe this too. I have also used vocational rehabilitation services and they don't treat those jobs with such disrespect, but I definitely got the feeling some jobs are stepping stone jobs.

I disagree. As someone with a history of blowing past my debit card allotted overdraft amount (though more recently am much better), I think my history with a debit card would show that I was young and foolish, but I have learned better and I wouldn't be a problem now. But I'm only spit balling, you may have more insight to shoot this down.

What about with wine? I haven't tried, but could old 16bit apps run in wine on windows x64?

>>many people who can get pregnant

>instead of

>>many women

>I wonder if that was deliberate

I grew up around gender queer and androgynous people and thus I am used to using they/them and people instead of classifying a group of people by their gender. So I naturally speak/write in a less gender classified way without deliberate intent and I see this writing as just that. (Though obviously that is my bias.)

It could probably go something like this:

Juul the brand does not want to market to kids because laws, FDA, etc. Some incompetent VP of marketing wanted to quickly boost numbers, ethics be damned.

I don't mean to stick up for Juul, but it's not out of the realm of possibility considering how incompetent the company sounds from the above.

This can be done with ffmpeg and it's "reverse" filter, it seems, according to:

https://video.stackexchange.com/a/35262

Oh, we've noticed. Apple doesn't care.

You still "went to" a search engine within the last year, just using a non-visual document rendering user agent. DDG logs (if there are any) would still show you were there, just not with a typical browser.

Just a friendly reminder for Google users, backup your cloud data before you can't.

https://takeout.google.com/

Marketing is feel good wording, usually nothing of real value or substance. So words like "Pro" and "Premium" come off as "classy," but in no way shape or form reflect upon the quality or content of what's being marketed. It's all hot air to swindle you into spending your tendies.

Sometimes companies do use "Pro" or "Premium" to separate product lines and usually the puffed up one might have more features, which is where trust in Pro/Premium comes from (probably), however, eventually the terms become meaningless as product lines merge, situations like in this article occur, and don't forget the companies that just slap those words onto things to make whatever they're selling just seem better than they are ("premium" sound quality on $8 earbuds for example. wtf?).

maybe I'm just getting old and cynical...

We hear you.

I think we should work in offices with the ability to work remotely when necessary and(/or) if we choose. I don't like needing to find the perfect spot to setup my desk where my company isn't looking into my home. I don't like having a company laptop that at any given time could be listening in on family conversations. I don't like the idea of my company seeing my child struggle through LGBTQQIA+ issues because I happen to have a work camera at home. I like and enjoy my privacy. I want offices to still be a thing.

I tried....and it didn't work.

Thank you. I appreciate the description of what was tried and didn't work or didn't work as well as hoped. We need more of this so I don't waste time (or you don't too).

Development seems to be moving in that direction already (see market share per browser and the number of "Chrome only" sites). How would removing UAs continue or hinder that trend?

This is clever and fantastic. I have been pondering a similar concept recently and I think I would like to contribute. I'm curious as to why LGPL-3 was chosen as the license, though, not that the license is a show stopper.

You know what, I was unintentionally fear mongering. I'm glad you and others pointed that out. I did not make the connection between you having Omicron and the lack of Omicron in the paper (my nephew caught Delta...so that's where my concern lied). I hope you are still ok. :)

One might want to pay attention if the boat had a leak...

I do apologize if you took that as fear mongering, I have a nephew in a similar situation as you and we are keeping an eye on him just in case anything does come up, not that we expect anything will.

Granted this still needs peer review...but you may want to look into this:

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1139035/v1

I hope your recovery goes well and you truly have zero issues.

I'm anticipating an, "oops, we didn't mean to enable this by default; thanks for your compute time. Apply for a rebate [here]." notice at some point...

I really like the concept so I gave your PWA a try. The first recipe I tried[1] did not work as the app said it was unable to find a recipe. The wording also went down past the bottom of the screen, but I was unable to scroll to see the rest of the text. I used the "Desktop site" option my browser has and then was able to read the full message.

[1]: https://www.food.com/recipe/homemade-curry-powder-38702

https://github.com/widevinedump/NETFLIX-DL-6.0 seems to have just been replaced with https://github.com/widevinedump/NETFLIX-DL-6.1.0

Due to a bad connection the 6.0 clone didn't finish. So, naturally, I tried again and was receiving a login prompt....so I go to the URI in a browser and ... 404. But the 6.1 repo was available...

> including radically improved analytics (for those who opt in!)

Thank you so much for making analytics opt in. :)

Perhaps one should encrypt files before uploading to cloud services. Sure it destroys the possibility of webview for your data, but then you don't have to worry about situations like this.

Claiming Web7. :)

This is for the privacy focused. Telemetry is not.

What provider doesn't do this? Has any said they never would (or have acted in this regard)? I'm all for getting on the anti-VZW bandwagon, but realistically, what are your options?

I'm on a Verizon phone currently and that link gives me a 404. Perhaps the service hasn't rolled out to everyone yet?

Sometimes you just don't have that choice.