Do you not subscribe to the idea stealing=bad?
967 karma · joined November 14, 2014
While popular artists indeed can make a killing touring, it costs money for those playing smaller venues, or god forbid, playing as an opening act.
Labels have a tour marketing budget to cover the expense of building a following on the road.
NaN == NaN
Why clearly?
I like standing up to workplace nonsense as much (or way more) than the next guy/gal, but seems rigid to refuse to code from a different room for a day.
Worked at a startup that used the "we had saboteurs in our midst, but they were discovered and now things will improve" story on the eve of needed new financing round. The story was somewhat accurate but had very little to do with the overall arc of growth or progress.
Tesla will need something to say about why they didn't make their targets, and this is going to be one of the things said.
In my very humble opinion this is the way a bad therapist works.
I've gone to therapy to deal with real problems - attention issues, a bout of anxiety - and having somebody mostly repeat back to me what I said was so, so unhelpful.
For this reason, the vast majority of "good' therapists, in this market anyhow, choose to not accept below-market rates.
The issue with sugar is how the body processes fructose and glucose. Unless there is indication that substances present in non-organic vs organic sugar modify digestion of sucrose and fructose there isn't much to the theory organic makes sugar less harmful.
What kind of study design is this? It seems like they compared veganism with 4 garbage diets. Seems like all we can extract from this is plant-based is better than eating trash.
http://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-sim...
Lots of professionals with great titles and affiliations steer people down a totally incorrect path.
An easy example of this is Harvard study published in the New England Journal of Medicine promoting dietary fat reduction, shaping what every credentialed person would advise for diet for the next 50 years: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074...
Drug companies shoulder the rep of being cold evil capitalists. Psychiatrists also become extremely wealthy as part of this medical complex, and get to keep a positive reputation. It reminds me of ticketmaster essentially being paid to shoulder negative PR for excessive ticket fees which are often largely passed on to performers.
This response makes me wonder how exactly you are answering the question. I can't image almost anybody giving guff for "honestly i've been working non-stop and just needed to unwind and clear my head".
There is nothing wrong with going to a general practitioner, trying Lexapro, and if you don't feel anything on that, trying Wellbutrin, and then on down the line.
If you administer the Beck Depression inventory to gauge your own mood on some consistent basis before and after starting antidepressants you will be introducing far more of the scientific method into the process than most psychiatrists will.
> I'd have loved to be a fly ...
loving anything about that sad scenario seems impossible.
If you would like entertaining reading to assist in your own building of a new mental model around money:
https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/
(written by a programmer who retired early and is part of the "financial independence" movement/blogosphere)
However, a word like "lazy" is a bit tricky. While you are saying "stop being lazy" (meaning - please cease the behavior you are exhibiting in this moment) it can have an undertone of "you are lazy", especially if repeated over the course of days/months/years.
I wonder if there is a better phrasing to respond in a scenario like a kid not searching for his own backpack. Maybe "Do the work!"
I wonder if this is another argument to overthrow Elsevier to as clearly their peer review for publication is a poor filter. Or, is it possible the peer review process will become even weaker in a new more open paradigm?