bro-kaizen

You can probably just use Google's reverse image search and then look at the "related images" pane on the right.

Something tells me that if it were the chief of Police's motorcycle stolen, the bobbies might be a bit more energetic in recovering it. Probably what the GP expects is some subset of what they would do for the chief.

Wait really? It feels like almost every time I make a new account somewhere and drop in the 200 character high-entropy password that LastPass generated, I get a silent failure or misleading error message about "your username was not recognized." Then I try guessing which feature of my candidate password is pissing off the site: Is it the whitespaces? Special characters? Length?

This is particularly maddening because there are plenty of ways to accept arbitrary passphrases from users.

In cattle country, the law is "fence them out," ie. if you don't want your neighbors' cows grazing on your land, it's your job to fence them out, instead of his job to fence them in.

Claim: We need something analogous to "fence the out" for "being offended" if we want to construct a broadly participatory society, complete with free, open, and vibrant debate. In other words, perhaps our society should standardize on the convention that it is your job to not be offended by things, instead of other peoples' job to not offend you. Perhaps this might boil down to civilly agreeing to disagree.

Given a large number of religious/ideological groups and a larger number of issues with non-negligible probabilities of offending someone, it becomes likely that many statements in the public discourse will be offensive to someone.

We can model the situation binomially and compute the likelihood of at least one success (offending some group) in N trials, where N is the number of events in the public discourse per day (perhaps 10^5 in today's fractured media landscape) and the probability of offense is on average perhaps 1/(.001N). It's not hard to see that at least one success will probably happen every day. That's why I think we need a more robust system for dealing with this.

I've heard of the "Deep State" with respect to Turkey and Erdogan, but never in the American context. Can you elaborate a little on what you mean by that?

"...razing a few cities..."

Actually, the Americans were on the border of _running out of targets_ in WWII Japan because they had already destroyed all the cities.

May I humbly suggest Keepass (0) and its many incarnations for various platforms? It's free as in beer and speech and seems to work pretty well.

(0) http://keepass.info

But unfortunately pop quizzes take place literally every day :(

> " thunder run "

Didn't they used to call that Blitzkrieg?