585 karma · joined December 15, 2009
au BufWinEnter * let w:matchnonascii=matchadd('ErrorMsg', "[\x7f-\xff]", -1)Edit: A cursory search through the BBC's recipe database shows their tags to be notably more thorough, though at times mistaken (butter labeled vegan in http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/recipes/sugar_and_spice_67172) and unfortunately just as immutable at the NYT site.
I like the idea that the boardgames I buy, barring physical abuse, will be playable by future generations in 20 years time. You can't "end-of-life" a physical product.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iDAkEpCmBs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnAofkVHZOQ
"If..., then..." and "I've spoken English for decades."
I would have loved it all the more if all the NPCs were shades of grey instead of more obvious blacks and whites.
That might make it even trickier if the answer isn't a set of radio buttons, but checkboxes instead.
The noise may well be indirectly tracking building height. ;)
I get that it would be an added layer of indirection, but to allow each user to have multiple subject personas for posting and let others subscribe to said personas might have been more useful. As it stands, I err on the side of caution and post privately to the people I can best guess might be interested.
On top of that, you then have to consider the potentially lower popularity of your favourite choice against that of the current lead contenders. Do you reduce your vote for the better of two evils so that your sincere preference has a better chance? Ugh.
I'm not trying to suggest tactical voting doesn't exist in other systems, but to suggest that it doesn't in Range voting is either misinformed or disingenuous.