The Interface Hall of Shame
hallofshame.gp.co.at
hallofshame.gp.co.at
The rise of the Web, which has no such toolkit, as an application platform has therefore opened the doors to UI atrocities the likes of which the perpetrators of these could only dream.
Take a look at the in depth critique of Lotus Notes. Half of it is still valid for the current version 18 years later. I thought I'd gone crazy the first time i tried to use the somewhat special IBM password prompt in Notes 9.
Er, yes? That is in fact somewhat more inclusive than choosing male or female with radio buttons? Not ideal, but still better? Why is this in a hall of shame?
The design seems normal to us now, but it's still problematic. (Although the rest of the UI seems to be getting worse at an even greater rate, so people might not expect the dialogs to make sense anymore.)
In particular, the horizontally scrollable non-detailed view (faithfully copied by KDE) might have made sense when filenames were restricted to 8.3 characters[1] but is absurd with long file names.
[1] As in the Windows 3.1 file manager: http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/windows31_1...
If you look at the source, the cases are correct. I assume it's a CSS thing whoever made the mirror did, possibly as a joke.