botusaurus

parent is saying at that stage the powerfull will not need you anymore

so you become target practice

nick land knew:

capitalism = AI

communism = human security system

but capitalism always wins

historical evidence also tells us that global thermonuclear war will not happen

companies can also have a Claude on the receiving end to sniff if its a poor or rich Claude browsing

code is free now, ask the agent to fork it, study it for malware, and maintain it for you

Your comment is so divorced from reality...

have you tried stuffing a whole set of tutorials on how to use ghidra in the context, especially for the 1 mil token context like gemini?

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now.

as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

i see whitepaper, i ask what shitcoin you are peddling

you are very presuming that you are able to

many websites block access from cloud ips - reason why openclaw creator recommended a local one

you need to add cron to have a claw

langchain is stuck in innovator dilemma - it was built for gpt 3.5, or 4, it needs a different design for todays models, but cant evolve because of existing users and backward compatibility

just like jQuery still exists and is being actively developed

be honest, how much of this big comment was "expanded" with AI?

not on your mind, yet you found the time to write this comment

are you sure this is about time/breaking and not "being told how to think"?

why do they call it a vaccine, its nothing like that...

there's probably a reason evolution didnt put the immune system on permanent "amber alert" as they call it in the article

this article is so dumb. NVIDIA delivered what the market wanted - gamers dont need FP64, they dont waste silicon on it. now enterprise doesnt want FP64 anymore and they are reducing silicon for it too

weird way to frame delivering exactly what the consumer wants as a big market segmentation fuck the user conspiracy

some people might be better at prompting a LLM than you

just like when you go to a restaurant to have a chef cook for you when you can cook yourself

maybe the reason they are so close is that the AES microcode is inplementing exactly those operations

what about the interaction between these 2 flows:

- summarize email to text file

- send report to email

the issue is tracking that the first step didnt contaminate the second step, i dont see how you can solve this in a non-probabilistic works 99% of the time way

parent was talking about a different problem. to use your framing, how you ensure that in the email sent to the proper to/cc/bcc as you said there is no confidential information from another email that shouldnt be sent/forwarded to these to/cc/bcc

the big labs talk about curing cancer - Altman, Hassabis, Musk

the little guys hype Claw

but how do you check that an email is being sent to #general, agents are very creative at escaping/encoding, they could even paraphrase the email in words

decades ago securesm OSes tracked the provenience of every byte (clean/dirty), to detect leaks, but it's hard if you want your agent to be useful

i want to see cats cook. the animal kingdom does not deliver on this front

he says claude is the best model for a personal assistent, and that codex is the best model for coding

so if you skipped the final rolling it would be shiny on both sides?

is this being produced?

you didn't see because you dont follow peter on twitter. he talked for months now how codex is a better coder.

ok, your quote was over generalized, you meant "current LLM need..." and not "any conceivable LLM"

although the word "energy" does not appear on that page, not sure where you get the galaxy energy consumption from

> However, LLM would also require >75% of our galaxy energy output to reach 1 human level intelligence error rates in general.

citation needed

do you think Terence Tao can solve any math problem in the world that is solvable by another matematician?