Why does aluminum foil have one shiny side and one with a matte finish?
bookofjoe2.blogspot.com
bookofjoe2.blogspot.com
> We chemists get annoyed at things like that.
> Now, about aluminum foil.
Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to spell aluminium properly...
I propose we switch to that instead, so everyone can be annoyed equally and in the same way.
That's just patently false. Anyone who's had any sort of education in chemistry/physics is aware of the history of the word and doesn't give a damn.
This suffix is used to derive nouns or adjectives from other nouns, where the derived nouns are understood to have some kind of relationship with the base nouns.
A great number of the names of chemical elements use the Latin variant of this suffix, i.e. "-ium", to derive the name of the element either from the name of the substance from which it has been extracted, or from the name of some characteristic property of the element or from some mythological name or from some person or place that is intended to be honored by this choice.
The name of aluminium comes from the name of the aluminium sulfate in Latin, which was "alumin-".
So "aluminium" means "something that is not aluminium sulfate, but it is related to aluminium sulfate".
On the other hand, "aluminum", which lacks the derivation suffix, just means "aluminium sulfate" (which has become "alum" in English), but the noun has been converted from the 3rd Latin declension to the 2nd Latin declension. Such conversion between declensions were not unusual even for native Latin speakers.
So this is definitely a grammar mistake, which is annoying for those who understand the meaning of words, because it creates an exception that must be remembered, instead of applying the general rule.
In general the British and American scientists have always been much more lax in observing grammar rules than the continental Europeans. So there are also other chemical elements where the English names differ from the correct names. For instance the name of the chemical element "silicium" is derived from Latin "silic-" (flint), from which it is extracted, but in English it has been changed to "silicon", for the silly reason to make it rhyme with "carbon", despite the fact that most chemical properties of silicon resemble more those of boron or of phosphorus or of germanium, than those of carbon (because valence is only 1 of the 3 main properties that determine chemical behavior, electronegativity and ionic/atomic size are equally important). (Carbon is one of the few elements that were known in pure form already in the Ancient World, so its name is not derived from another noun.) ("Boron" has also been changed in English to make it rhyme with "carbon", which is equally baseless.)
Any truth to that I wonder?
So, "technically yes" is good enough answer for me.
Your food won't radiate much heat, but your oven certainly does. Aluminum + broiler is like photolithography for food.
I worry for you if you're microwaving aluminum foil.
(Steak is definitely a salad, though.)
...and if one layer is meat and the other is a perfect meat vehicle, like a tortilla, you can simply fold it over the meat and wrap all the meat goodness is the proper warmth of a tortilla. Food, the way food was intended.
is this being produced?
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20060612212953/http://people.csa...