bofadeez

Many would agree that the official CNN and USA Today are already "fake" in a sense.

Send them to the Victorville Film Archive care of film buff Gregg Turkington.

VirusTotal detects malware on windows version "Bkav Pro W32.AIDetectMalware" (alert)

I think you missed the point, unless you need another analogy to try to literally debunk

New study links increase in global warming to increase in teenage pregnancy

Copy/paste an HN comment thread into chatgpt and ask it to generate a comment that 50% will agree with and 50% will disagree with. And then observe the engagement.

You can reproduce both of those responses zero shot on 70B with "Let's verify step by step" appended at the end.

Not going to work - https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01798

I might be interested in buying storage at 1/10 of the price if the only tradeoff was a 5 minute wait to power on a hard drive.

Sounds like https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm

Relax, pivoting isn't the end of the world

> I would never advise anyone do, like put sensitive information in a system prompt and make it available to the open internet

So your product can never assist with a company chatbot / AI support rep who needs access to customer data or internal company info?

What's the point of your product if you don't facilitate sensitive data in system prompts?

Sounds like psychometrics is unsuitable for modeling this problem, according to what you're saying. When you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.

Better spend more then. I'm in favor of 99.99% of GDP personally.

Let's do a study on whether it's generally painful to touch a hot stove with an unprotected hand. I know it sounds obvious but that's the spirit of science! No, I haven't suffered a head injury, I think this is a good idea!

I guess this is useful for individuals who suffer from extreme autism and have trouble understanding social interactions. Which to be fair is a huge percentage of HN user base.

Talk about a growth industry

I think that's a very creepy cultish point of view. You can easily be manipulated by corrupt science you don't have a PhD level understanding in. Why do you distrust your intuition? I would reference the book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (outlines how mental processes work rapidly and automatically from relatively little information... strengths of the adaptive unconscious in expert judgment)

Which pundits are you talking about? Whether that's true or false has no bearing on the truth value of the discussion. You're not adding anything except emotional expressions about how you personally feel. That's not relevant to whether DEI fundamentally discriminates on the basis of race or not.

In this case, common sense is only verified. Whose intuition has been disproved?

A monkey could literally confirm this idea. So it fails at the very value proposition you're offering. It's at very least an unremarkable study, right?

There's no information or content in your reply.

Of course. VCs exist to generate profit for themselves. They should fund whoever they think will help them get a ROI. Otherwise they can just stop risking their capital and go chill out on a beach instead. They don't exist to give a fair shot to everyone who deserves it.

Facial symmetry and body proportions that would indicate health and suitability for reproduction.

You mean affirmative action and DEI based discrimination?

Why do we need a study to explain common sense to adults?

Yeah that's the whole point. Who thought teeth? lol

It's people who generally don't have any other skills and reject all evidence for Efficient Market Hypothesis. They legitimately think what they're doing is not gambling. No amount of empirical evidence can convince them they have no risk-adjusted alpha

It's foolish to judge someone from a single statement. Give them something to do and see how it works out.

Yeah 200 lines of JavaScript, available for the last year. Super cutting edge

Looks like https://github.com/MoritzLaurer/GPT-google-sheets