1,633 karma · joined September 10, 2010
http://disattention.com/contact/
twitter.com/bobdiaes
All the Javascript, Flash, Webfonts, etc are breaking MY Internet. Why should I let everyone send executable code to my browser?
I find it annoying when that happens. Also, Google's recommendation is to allow 5 clicks a day and allow everyone with "GoogleBot" in their useragent. I wish the implementation was better.
> Is it asking to sign in? I tried in incognito mode and I could read the groups just fine.
You are right, I cleared my cookies and I stopped getting the login redirection.
In fact, Google wants even more such results. See First Click Free: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&...
Oh and here are 240 million login-walled pages: https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:groups.google.com/grou...
DEFCON 20: Robots: You're Doing It Wrong (waiting for better quality)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUlcTbfoz3U
Defcon 19: Katy Levinson - Don't Fix It In Software
Not only does this shit fly but Google are doing it on their own websites.
EDIT: I'm guessing you don't believe me. Try clicking on a Google Groups link.
This article has another example: http://www.seobook.com/googles-youtube-caught-cloaking-spam-...
Google repeatedly violates the "guidelines" they try to force on other webmasters.
The focus on cutting CO2 emissions seems misplaced.
The best thing I've read on the topic:
http://rps3.com/Pages/Burt_Rutan_on_Climate_Change.htm
"Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) -Study the data and reach your own conclusions!"
I only allow it when a website is unusable without it.
Affordable implies to me that they are not asking for free access.
http://philterphactory.com/2012/04/02/jon_ronson-a-weavr-of-...
I think pg indulged us in this experiment. IIRC the front page was pretty much the same.
Say you have a lead form with two fields, email and zip code. You would store a variety of data points besides those two. Referring URL, IP address, useragent, etc. If you just hash everything, and I gain access to your hashed values, it would be easy to make a lookup table reversing the one-way hash, at least for some of the data points.
I haven't had a chance to read the k-anonymity or related papers, but from what I understand it's not specific to data points like age/sex/etc.
How about k-anonymity?
Thanks for the inspiration. I need to do this.
Common Crawl is a non-profit that maintains a big crawl dataset.
They won and they are not required to operate a fingerprinting system.