Blueseed: Visa-free startup platform on a ship 30 minutes from Silicon Valley
slideshare.net
slideshare.net
No, no the whole idea about building a floating incubator. It's the fact that immigrant & visa laws are so ridiculously outlandish that it's perfectly conceivable to devise an elaborate and expensive "hacks" to circumvent them. Along with IP, this is probably the most visible area where U.S. law is stiffing innovation rather than fostering it.
If you sell everything you have to live on this ship just outside of the US to sort of get access to a part of the US that the current visa system says you can't have access to, you may find you have a hard time demonstrating you have non-immigrant intent when trying to go to shore for meetings or R&R.
http://www.visapro.com/Immigration-Articles/?a=1575&z=31
Keep in mind that every entry to the US is at the discretion of whatever border agent you happen to get that day, and pre-approved visa in your passport is merely a guide and not a guarantee of entry.
1. Taxes:
So you incorporate on the BVIs or a similar tax heaven, because you don't want to pay taxes. You are not even using the infrastructure of a country, so that doesn't even feel morally wrong. But crucial parts of your company lay within the USA (servers, some investors, consultants, bank accounts..). There have been tax cases before (at least in Europe) where it has been argued that a server equals a permanent business establishment and therefore is taxable (I can not find an English language article on the quick but I remember a case where a german hat incorporated in Cyprus and used german servers). So that would be a mess.
2. Bank accounts
Does the country of the boats registration or the country you choose to incorporate have a stable banking system and currency? Can you get a Paypal (or whatever payment provider) account for this bank account? Or will you go for a US bank, which again leads us to (1), also I dont know how hard it is to open a bank account in the US on the name of a foreign company with no entity in the US. What will potential costumers think about bank accounts in county x? What happens if the US tightens rules on money laundry, making your transfers a pain?
Many questions will have to be solved on the way. I really hope the project succeeds, especially if it pushes US law-makers to think about their visas.
2. Once you have a US corporation, you can have a US bank account.
So while the issues you raise could be problems for some companies, it's actually fairly straightforward and cheap (there are costs to your agents in Delware and a few similar items).
edited for style and coherence
I know its pretty easy to incorporate in the US, but AFAIK as soon as you do business with the US (rent servers from US company, have US-bank account) you are subject to the IRS (I don't know what rules apply). Why pay taxes and/or waste resources (tax consultants / lawyers) to a country that didn't want your business in the first place?
Also how will order be enforced? One cannot assume everyone will be nice and benevolent. What happens in a medical emergency, can you get to the nearest hospital in time (assuming the onboard facilities are insufficient)? The lead programmer just fell overboard during a storm, what happens?
This problem has been solved for cruise ships. I don't know the details of how, but surely the same issues and solutions apply pretty directly.
The law is either the nearest country (if you're 12 or 24 nautical miles away, depending on the circumstances), or the law of their flag state (if they are in the high seas). Generally, they avoid making arrests, and throw trouble makers out the next port. I think their registered home state generally turns a blind eye on what they do.
The "avoid making arrests, and throw trouble makers out" approach seems viable. Make sure companies on the boat post a bond for their employees that will cover throwing them out (sending them to their country of citizenship or the ships flag state for trial) if they won't/can't leave on their own.
> Also how will order be enforced?
This all too easily lends itself to some pirate jokes, perhaps revolving around vim users being forced to walk the plank.
That's not really how large ships work.
It's not that common for people to fall overboard accidentally.
Pay for some private military contractors, doctors, and a standby helicopter. Split the cost.
EDIT: If PMC are too militant, just any lenient security company would do. I don't really see how this is a problem. Think of it as a big festival with less alcohol and run for a longer time period.
IMO private military contractors are pretty much a non-answer to the problem of policing. I'd go as far as to say that PMCs are an inappropriate solution to any problem that doesn't involve lots of people getting shot.
Festivals have to deal with minor security, not criminal problems. Police are still around - whether patrolling the area, or in an on-site office, or on the end of a phone call - to deal with any major problems (all the way up to rape and murder).
It all depends on the mood of third parties.
But actually this is the greatest hack to the immigration laws available.
I ran tech ops on Sealand 2000-2002 (which is basically "The Platform That Rocked"), and due to a great relationship with the local pilots and the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, there were zero problems with them. This wasn't the case in the 60s/70s, which is why they got treated badly.
The USA is basically a datahaven today for many things, and has been for a while.
Here in Startup Chile, a lot of the companies are run by women or involve women-- I'd say the gender ratio (completely unscientific) is something like %60 men, not %90 men.
Who pays the rent? What if the team member wants a private cabin and not sweatshop style accommodation? (Maybe I am thinking about the wrong demographic?)
- What happens when you want to leave and your visa is expired/revoked ? This sound like a place where you could really get stuck, with all the associated potential for abuse.
- They can make a killing on the price of coffee, food and entertainment for all these people.
Minor quibble: the 1GBps link seems small distributed over all the companies/person they imagine.
10 Gbps = 1280 MB/s.
IF there's an airport, might even be close enough for people to come down in their gulf streams for board meetings. (I don't give a damn about being close to silicon valley, but do like the idea of working near there startups.)
The real cultural wins they talk about in this slide deck don't come from the formal interactions planned ahead, but the random ones. The other day I was having an americano while doing some research in a cafe I'd never been to, and I accidentally got into a conversation with someone I'd never met before about writing compilers, changing python syntax for domain specific VM performance, and our favorite keyboards. The conversation has sparked at least a week of creativity and thought.
Anyone who's worked in technology outside of Silicon Valley (RTP, what up!) knows just how amazingly drastic the difference is. You're not going to be able to co-opt it on a boat 1.5-2 hours away.
But maybe they will. I'm going to bet against this, but I hope I lose my money. Success being a function of birthplace and parental wealth/race is a tragedy.
I've always found the blueseed idea backwards. Come on, live on a boat just to be able to work in some country? I wouldn't do that unless I had no other choice. And it's horribly inefficient and expensive too. I surely hope that petty geography issues will become less important in the future, as international cooperation through the internet increases.
Hell, this is looking like an elevator pitch for a "counter-startup". Anyone interested?
Also, we do not know which flag they will sail under, but it my bet is that they will adopt the US flag. My understanding is that such an act would be an act of piracy against the USA itself.
Furthermore, they wouldn't be THAT far from land. Even in the impossible event that they government turned a blind eye to the fate of the ship, they would not want some armed terrorist skimming their borders.
While the boat wouldn't be far from the land, any potential attackers would be an ocean away. I assume the boat would be fairly safe. It is not like they'll be sailing next to Somalia.
Otherwise, an interesting idea!
I have done some good and creative work at sea. On the last cruise my wife and I took which lasted 25 days, many days were spent at sea and I found the public areas like the library were great places to both write and do some work. On sea days, spending 3 or 4 hours a day "working" didn't detract at all from enjoying the trip - given my tastes, it made the trip better. Except for shore tours which can be very expensive, the costs of spending long periods of time on cruise ships is not as much as you might think: the trick is to make reservations at the last minute and get jaw-dropping good deals.
What I am saying is that some people would probably really enjoy living and working on Blueseed, perhaps even some US citizens who want to partner with others in startups.
I'd rather cut my wrists than to spent my time on a boat full of prima-donas that want to "change the world".
I would love to move to SF one day, but I want to have living quality as much that country as to offer ,which isn't that good if you come from Europe, let's be honest, but it's probably one of the best places to live in the US, and not some artificial thingy floating in sea,
Again, if the US doesn't want us there because of our potential/skills, well then, I suggest we stop putting it in this big pedestal and start creating our own startups on our own countries or countries that want us there.
Question: Does YC fund foreign startups, if not, why ?
It's easy to set up a new company, the overhead is minimal and there are lots of financial and other supports available from government agencies like Enterprise Ireland:
http://www.enterprise-ireland.com/en/
We have a very low corporate tax rate and the government recently introduced R&D tax credits to encourage innovation:
http://www.bdolimerick.ie/department.php?pg=/Research%20and%...
Not to mention a very strong academic community, plenty of funding available for academic collaboration and the presence of a huge number of prominent US tech companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter, eBay, PayPal...
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/11/26/what-attracts-big-t...
The Irish startup visa program has recently been amended to make it easier to qualify:
http://founderware.co/ireland/ireland-launches-startup-visa-...
You now only need to invest €70k ($91k USD) to be granted residency. This is down from the old requirement of €300k.
Taxes here are quite reasonable. Corporations are charged 3.1x less tax here:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/us_companies_pay_the_...
On average, UK taxes are generally higher:
http://www.nationmaster.com/compare/Ireland/United-Kingdom/T...
And it compares favorably with the US as well:
http://www.nationmaster.com/compare/Ireland/United-States/Ta...
Contrast that with berlin-- a much more healthy lifestyle can be had there, at a lot less cost (both financial and emotional).
The one thing silicon valley has going for it is sand hill road. But I think venture capital is a lot less important now than it used to be-- at least it should be.
Getting a bunch of people who want to create startups together in a geographic area will attract the money eventually.
What countries support this idea? (I'd live in Berlin right now if german immigration wasn't a bear.)
However, I don't know him personally, but everything I've ever read that was written by Peter Thiel had a really obnoxious tone. Assuming he's like that in real life (and it's possible he isn't), I can't imagine people wanting to be stuck on a boat with him. I'm dead serious. If he's just backing the project financially, I could really see it working. But if he's making appearances, his writing really makes him sound like the most arrogant SOB you could ever meet. I really could see this project failing if one too many stressed out entrepreneurs living in close quarters got into a yelling match with him.
And where exactly do they make their money? A bed on this thing is going to be mighty expensive....
As a back-of-the-fag-packet calculation: 1,000 beds, if you are extremely lucky and well prepared 80% paid occupancy (staff, as well as unoccupied rooms), at $1,600pcm (their website mentions this as an average). ~$15m a year gross income. Minus operating costs, of which there are many large ones listed above, salaries etc. you'd be extremely lucky to be making a couple of million a year. Considering the ship alone is going to cost you > $50m for anything servicable (let alone the fanciful designs on their website), I think you'd be lucky to pay it off in 20 years.
Second, this is Peter Thiel throwing money at his ideals. He's probably more concerned with generating publicity for the ideas than making a perfect investment.
Third, they are also taking equity. A single or two good buy-outs or IPOs could pay for the whole thing.
And that's the problem. This strikes me as a Bioshock-y move - a libertarian who's sick of the "oppressive" government getting in his way, so now he's going to create his libertarian government-free paradise floating in the open seas.
... and has less to do with actually funding startups. The startups in this case seem like a means to an end, and as a startup I'd be very unsettled by that.
Not to mention, I can pay similar rent here in SF and not give up a big chunk of equity just to have office space.
I can picture the marauding feral packs of founders roaming the halls of the ship, ducking for cover behind burning barricades fashioned from Aeron chairs, hurling broken macbooks at interlopers from unfriendly decks.
Murder will be done on this boat.
It seems the timeframe is very optimistic (1 year to find a boat and adapt it??) but if it works it will change the world.
Same category as the libertarian-utopia "Oceania" project, the billion-dollar indoor ski resort near Atlanta, the bridge spanning the Strait of Gibraltar, and a half-dozen mile-high skyscraper projects. 1% of 1% of $1,000,000,000 is nothing for someone who could move that kind of money, but it's enough to keep me happy for a while. So, we buy a used cruise ship, park it in international waters, and ... hey, for 1% of 1% of total cost I'll give you a workable plan.
Seriously though, wouldn't this be considered "economic terrorism" by the US Gov't, eventually, if it does well?
No daily commuting. Small rooms, relatively efficient hvac. The only downsides are generating power/water locally (using diesels) and fuel for boats to/from (I really doubt they'll use helicopters much; they're really expensive, especially to operate over water). So probably somewhat more environmentally friendly than a similar number of people distributed across the Bay Area, but less efficient than everyone living in a Yscraper.
Diesel is expensive -- that alone will cause them to be fuel efficient and thus relatively environmentally friendly.
Big marine engines are crazy (like 100k horsepower?), but that's not what you would use for this purpose.
Worse, I'm half afraid if they build it, the US will just unilaterally declare that its borders extend out 20 or 50 miles into the sea. (they've done this with fishing rights in the past, I believe.) Or if they can't extend the borders, I don't expect the DHS to be very friendly to these people. ITs very obviously a hack around US's sovereignty and therefore will be perceived as a threat. Britain barely tolerates sealand mainly because of the genteel culture that appreciates eccentrics. IF Sealand was big enough to grow and be a real economy, it wouldn't be tolerated for very long. The US has less of a tradition of tolerance for these kinds of experiments.
I do think starting with a cruise ship is probably a good idea-- there are a lot of used cruise ships and they depreciate quite a bit over their working career. You could get a really nice ship really pretty cheap because there isn't much else of a market for them outside the cruise industry (and scrap doesn't pay that much.) I say this with some confidence because I've priced out cruise ships in the past for another idea (that was just an idea, not a project.) Eventually a lot of the ships become nearly free, and sell for the cost of a couple months moorage. Though of course on the older ships, renovations become expensive. TANSTAAFL. But old ships approach scrap value.
The sad thing is, if Peter Theil wanted to create a startup incubator City, and was willing to do it in Chile, the Chilean government would probably loan him all the money necessary to buy the land (say an hour or 2 out of santiago) and let him go to town. He could likely import as many startups as he wanted. A chilean residency visa for a year isn't that hard (costs about $1,000) and can be renewed each year and eventually you can just get a permanent residency visa if you want.
It just seems wrong to see people trying to bring startups to a country that clearly doesn't give a damn about them... when there are other countries that truly do give a damn.
Silicon Valley is a result of a historical confluence- the WWII industry, schools and all that. It won't be replicated and the government of California and the USA generally seems to take it for granted. (I read yesterday that tax receipts in california dropped %22 last year because of businesses leaving the state.)
I think the silicon valley of the next 50 years won't be in california... I think it would be better spending the effort building it somewhere that has a chance (notice how the tolerant regulatory environment of blue seed was one of its big attractions.) Whatever you build won't be just like silicon valley... but if it has a good visa policy, it will start attracting the best and the brightest from all over the world, because, frankly, most governments are hostile to business one way or another (even when they don't intend to be.)
Outside SV, many regard H-1B Visas as a force that creates downward pressure on wages and working conditions for software developers.
One thing we do know is that immigrants form "networks" in SV and other places. There's no doubt that some of these networks are highly innovative but it's also clear that many immigrants are motivated to bring as many of their friends from the "old country" as they can -- and this consideration might affect their decision and hiring practices more than rational and economic considerations.
The truth is that the social fabric is strained to the breaking point in SF and SV. You can't walk 25 feet in SF without tripping over a homeless hippie. I don't know exactly how, but the overheated venture capital culture has got something to do with it.
Something I never hear about is that SV investors might consider starting a secondary center in, say, Kansas City or Mumbai.
1. I believe that by law an H-1B professional's salaries have to be competitive so that they don't undercut the market. In fact, I recall in my previous company that they posted salaries drawn for each H1B position.
2. Re: The networking point. This happens everywhere. Immigrants don't have some sort of magical cultural bond that non-immigrants don't. There are huge networks formed by ex-frat house members, club members and family friends that go on to take over the upper rings of society. (The US political society anyone?)
3. The homeless situation in SF is complex and ascribing it to one factor: The fact that a lot of money is pouring to the bay area is not a very convincing factor. Some competing "reasons" are that SF has nicer weather (thereby attracting people from other parts of the country), is generally more hospitable to homeless people (This might be off base but I believe benefits are better).
Do you truly believe that when an industry writes legislation that they haven't left loopholes in the resulting laws large enough to navigate the Queen Elizabeth II through?