Come on, everyone wants to know what was inside??
731 karma · joined October 15, 2015
But then there are the „Wahlhelfer“ who openly proud themselves in Twitter to invalidate votes for parties they disagree with.
This is democracy?
Is the EU really a benefit to the people? Or is it a shit pool full of scum bags providing quite some damage to societies?
> June 8, 2024
Is this an article from the future?
1. change Meets call layout to one video (presentation) only, disabling participant watching
2. press F11 to make browser go full screen
3. press Ctrl+Minus multiple times to decrease UI elements which makes the shared video near full screen
But I was wrong, here’s the motivation on “push fors up”:
> The primary benefit here is performance. Plenty of performance, in extreme cases.
Imagine a simpler implementation for me where any earlier called subfunction would simply return the previous result, up to the point where the function was previously interrupted. Therefore these previous return values need to be stored (in what temporal calls a workflow), i.e. in a database. Sounds simple enough and decorators would probably help designing a good abstraction and keeping everything self-documenting and simple enough to understand.
While I have an idea how to implement it, now after having read the article and comments here, how is this concept called? Does an implementation for Python exist already?
who at OpenAI decides the right and wrong??
better swap lives with money here
Is it now allowed to talk openly about MKUltra, CIA involvement and amok runs? Or do CTs still need to hide, even after media outlets like Washing Post write about that, conforming its existence?
“I hate the news”