Lichee Console 4A: Mini Laptop with a RISC-V Processor and 7 inch display
liliputing.com
liliputing.com
The small screen size and cramped/weird layout KB made it too cumbersome to keep using it though. I wish there'd be laptops in the 9-11" range since that'd be a lot more workable I think.
I tried running Linux/Ubutunu on them, but I gave up. The fan did not work out of the box, requiring a patch. Sleep on lid-closing was broken, requiring a hack. But the critical thing that made me give up on Linux was the broken trackpad. Palm rejection is terrible on Linux, and Linux has no support for pinch-zooming. I cannot live without pinch-zooming on a Mac, especially on an 11" screen.
When Apple stops supporting Big Sur (my MBA11 2013) and Catalina (my MBA11 2015), I'll try OpenCore Legacy Patcher. If that doesn't work, I'll probably just keep using the old MacOS versions.
On Apple hardware, or in general? Because I pinch-zoomed on your comment in Firefox on Linux.
On the MBA11, I was slightly imprecise with that statement. I recall that pinch-zooming was bound to Ctrl+ on Firefox. But that is not what pinch-zooming does on MacOS. On MacOS, the zoom level remains unchanged (e.g. 170% for Hacker News) but the window content is smoothly zoomed in and out, without re-rendering the text or images. The zooming is so smooth and responsive that it feels like it's doing fractional percentages. There is almost no input lag from the movement of the fingers.
The Ctrl+ action, on the other hand, changes in discrete steps, (e.g. 100%, 110%, 125%, etc), and there is a noticeable lag caused by the rendering of the window content using the new zoom level. I find the Ctrl+ action to be unusable. (Addendum: On some web pages, I see an image that is too small. So I hit Ctrl+, which causes the image to become smaller. Argh. Pinch-zoom on MacOS causes the image to become bigger, because it doesn't change the zoom-level.)
https://pine64.com/product/pinephone-pinephone-pro-keyboard-...
Still tempted.
Would I daily drive it for coding? No. I can't even use crappy full-size laptop keyboards for long without pain, but as a very portable fully-feature device, this does have uses.
All these mini-devices get evaluated on the basis of whether they can be, eventually used for basic e-mail.
16GB RAM feels quite generous, while the 1280x800 resolution is barely enough.
What I really want is a slightly larger 11-12" mini laptop that would be the spiritual successor to the ThinkPad X220 which is to me the gold standard for portable and useful machines.
What I'd worry about with this is the weight of the thing. Not too heavy, too light - you kinda want something with a little bit of inertia so it doesn't scoot across the desk while you're typing on it.
Too small for a netbook / mini laptop, period.
If this came with ~10..12" (max) display, I'd be very tempted. 7".. will have some uses but not for me.
Pinebook Pro would have been useful if not for the abysmal keyboard quality.
I wonder about this one.
Really? I'm not exaggerating, when I say it's my second favorite laptop keyboard, only beat by the old thinkpad ones.
I hope someone remembers to post to HN when they are _actually_ available for purchase and reviews are up for it :)
2.7" -- Gameboy
4" -- Smaller old phone
6" -- Larger phone
7" -- Tablet
11" -- Netbook
13" -- Today's typical laptops
15" -- Traditional laptop
17" -- Desktop replacement laptop
22" -- Small Desktop screens.
---------
7" is really small for a laptop form factor. Could be interesting though.
Less ridiculously https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psion_Series_5
The Psions were reasonably successful too. My hunch is we are going to experience a slow rediscovery of the benefits of non touch interfaces.
Mechanical interfaces are superior, yes. But touch-capacitive is so cheap that I don't think we'd ever go back.
----------
Honestly, the Blackberry, Palm Centro, LG Optimus Enlighten were all good items I've used personally. The speed at which I could type / move around on those systems is absurdly faster than the slow, inaccurate, capacitive screens of today.
But I know a thing or two about manufacturing costs. Capacitive is just too cheap to compete against.
--------
Resistive screens (Gameboy DS bottom touchscreen) have benefits for relatively simplicity and better accuracy in my experience. But you lose on pinch-to-zoom or other multi-digit tracking. There's just been more work on capacitive touch that its the cheapest way to implement things today in practice.
Especially in things like cars, where "giant ipad centre console" for a long time was some sort of luxury-differentiator, when in fact it's a terrible, distracting, cost cutting measure. At some point the return of mechanical knobs and switches -- done stylishly and ergonomically -- will become the luxury signifier instead.
It's the #1 thing turning me off buying any Tesla, and I know I'm not the only one.
Slapping a touch screen in something to replace physical interfaces tells me a company not only cheaped out on components, but on design & UX research. It's hard work to design and lay out quality mechanical components.
It certainly is for "normal" laptop uses, but I would consider that rather a tool for tasks that require a real computer with a real OS and keyboard rather than a tablet with all its limitations. Unfortunately the lack of Ethernet port is quite a limitation in that context.