blablabla123

Not speculating whether Cramer or acquaintances of his have a stake on the stocks or not. But from what I remember from posts on WSB his advice if you'd follow through a) doesn't give very significant changes and b) rather goes in the negative direction. To me it seems it's hard to separate from noise. Of course this might be explained by stating a free money paradox. (If everyone invested...) But also it seems his advice is actually rather random and just fits an entertainment narrative at best or sales pitch at worst.

Lunch is a big one. Working remotely since the pandemic started I haven't ate this healthy in almost a decade. (And I don't need a coffee after lunch to not be sleepy) Also I've seen much higher quality 1:1 meetings.

Not sure if that's what you're looking for but there are Kubernetes distros. And yes, this also includes a relatively nice Web UI. But it's probably not easy to setup.

At my past job yes, at the current one it's swept under the rug. I even know someone that got fired for doing an error. (edit: and actually most teams seem to struggle with a lot of technical debt)

According to Wikipedia this is actually already ongoing since 2006.

So comparing to the last update day it must be medium then :)

Not sure if these numbers are the best to go by. Freifunk surely has the most setups. I might be completely wrong on this but I think most Freifunk installations are isolated, i.e. single-node with e.g. the local DSL as upstream. I wonder which of these have nodes with no cable-bound upstream or at least actually used interconnects with other nodes.

Definitely 1., velocity is kind of predictable, it's cheap and easier when working with more people. I like also more up-to-date stacks but collaboration is more tricky I think

Do you have a link for this? In the movie about it which plays around 2000 the corporate lawyer has a hard time finding someone who can say anything meaningful about it. That would be more than half a century later.

The comparison with Vitamins seems absurd. But really, what are "very high levels" then in ppm and exposure time?

Also the public's reaction is logical since information has been kept from the public for decades to hinder proper regulation. I think the successful class action lawsuit speaks for itself.

Not sure, but I remember the comparison with a light bulb. A bit artificial but it puts unintuitive units in perspective

The whole inflation seems transitory after all and might not self-accelerate. Also in the EU things seem to stabilize

Yeah the mathematics related SE sites seem to be very rational about mathematical problems

> Literally everything humans build need mining.

Actually one of the newest trend in architecture are large scale buildings made from (fire-proof!) wood

> Chernobyl was looked at by an international panel of scientist and engineers and early death related to it are below 1500. And many of those people live to pretty old age still.

Yeah and 600,000 people worked as liquidators.

I think a lot of those arguments (in fact on both sides) are overly nitpicky and based on niche facts making reasonable discussions next to impossible.

Nuclear seems this simplistic choice where the risk is shifted to somewhere where nobody can see it. Nobody knows about missing Core catchers, failure modes or insurance.

That said, new Nuclear plants are actually more expensive (LCOE) than other Energy forms with the exception of on-demand Gas

Uranium also needs to be mined actually and there are also fatalities.

> Once again 'paid the (nuclear) price', is 1 death. One.

Claiming a really low number of fatalities has almost become a meme for every nuclear catastrophe. I remember reading articles of people claiming really few fatalities related to Chernobyl. But if you've watched the Netflix series, you can easily see that this cannot be further from the truth

By the way, in the same article it's also written that 'Predicted future cancer deaths due to accumulated radiation exposures in the population living near Fukushima have ranged[14] in the academic literature from none[15] to hundreds.[12]' ... 'For long-term displacement, many people (mostly sick and elderly) died at an increased rate ... As of 27 February 2017, the Fukushima prefecture government counted 2,129 "disaster-related deaths" in the prefecture.[21][19][22][23] This value exceeds the number that have died in Fukushima prefecture directly from the earthquake and tsunami.[24]'

That, I wanted to mention this myself. E.g. adopting kids that are already in school. That'll make their day and also considering today's divorce rates they'd probably be already studying should a divorce ever happen. I know families that adopted kids and everyone did really well (and did not divorce from what I heard anyway)

VSCode might be better feature-wise than Atom but I'd choose Atom any time of the day over VSCode if it was still maintained. Just considering CVEs popping up every now and then. Also I found the UX getting slightly less in the way. Otherwise Sublime is my go to "normal" editor but it's not really free...

Wasn't the Android project criticized for years because they didn't put in the effort for upstreamable changes?

After all the modifications mentioned are probably quite use-case specific. Not sure how much this can be generalized

Generally I agree although in case of the GPL there's a lot to criticize especially about the whole GNU project in my opinion. It's hard to identify with it these days and at the same time seeing how so many projects with less restrictive licenses flourish. Also working at a day job with GPL isn't exactly inspiring

For the Fusion the particles need to get close - but not to close. So the particles in the Tokamak get heated up to reach that. Also it's designed to run continuously but the challenge is the magnetic field so the particles won't hit the wall. (And cool down very quickly)

The Inertia based fusion works by providing the heat/energy with lasers, so the fuel would have to be replaced continuously.

It provides a lot of improvements actually. Stating the obvious, NAT isn't needed anymore. Also with modern Firewalls rules need to be written only once. At this point I'm just surprised why it's not adopted

> And I was very conservative with systems like GPT and DALLE-2

Yeah those are impressive but basically toys. Although at the moment it's clearly still a research prototype. For some things it works really well and beats Google by saving dozens of clicks and repeated searches, for others it's just plain wrong.

True for existing plants maybe depending on local circumstances but the LCOE is for new plants actually really high.

> A vocal community has been calling out the blatant scams and corruption for years

And not only that, even people who made fortunes in the financial markets.

> and so the obvious temptations were tempting...

But that is what happened. It's bad for people who've put in money they couldn't afford to lose

Yeah I was planning to buy no more Apple products but they do something really right with the Watch and the iPhone. If you've ever been in a situation where you need help it turns out it's on the practical side not so easy

Sure, but that's really strictly hobby. Anything remotely for commercial usage or even open source isn't an option, there the prices are 10x. Also for people just having finished studies even those prices can be a lot. IMHO the Home/Hobby licenses seem to be in a very tiny niche

Also the actual value of Mathematica or Maple seems to me how good solvers are. E.g. when it comes to Integrals or just solving a non-linear equation. Also most common tasks work good enough. A good/fast UI is also important (like for Maxima, although I miss modern convenience a bit)

I doubt it, probably also because the price tag is so far away from cheap/for free if you cannot go for any student program in which case the question probably doesn't even pop up

Obviously they are although I often think many modern conspiracy theories are just an extremely poor attempt of story telling actual problems. Maybe it's not even on purpose but imagining how the theory is told from person to person, with more noise, distortions and embellishments until it gets written down...

I would probably try to involve sociologists who specialize in a relevant field. I cannot stop thinking that every sufficiently large social network so far seemed to degenerate into a complete cesspool. Some important bits seem to be missing