How do I draw a pair of buttocks? (2014)
mathematica.stackexchange.com
mathematica.stackexchange.com
If you're interested in learning the fundamentals of some of the math he uses, I can highly recommend the CMU computer graphics course. It's free on YouTube.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9_jI1bdZmz2emSh0UQ5iOdT2...
The professor, Keenan Crane, puts out a ton of super interesting, high-quality research as well. His website is awesome.
...although I have to say that it is a little bit embarrassing that my "reputation" up to now is mainly from this thread. –
mikuszefski
Nov 25, 2014 at 18:19 pelvisLoc = AnatomyData[Entity["AnatomicalStructure", "Pelvis"], "RegionBounds"];
Show[
Entity["AnatomicalStructure", "Skin"]["Graphics3D"],
PlotRange -> pelvisLoc,
PlotRangePadding -> {33, 33, 19},
ViewPoint -> {0.961, 1.62, 0.203},
ViewVertical -> {0.109, 0.284, 1.202}
]
It certainly shows how rich of a data set mathematica has. This[1] was another such example.1: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/71631/upgoat-or...
In German, this is actually a double pun, because Po = butt.
I was going to complement you on making up a term, but I googled and it is unfair a thing.
"Von Neumann's elephant is a problem in recreational mathematics, consisting of constructing a planar curve in the shape of an elephant from only four fixed parameters. It originated from a discussion between physicists John von Neumann and Enrico Fermi."
ɛ ɜ ɝ
ɷ
̫
Ѡ
ও
દ
ପ
థ ద ధ
ധ
ሠ
ᗳ
ᆺ ㈆It would perform well on reddit surely.
Before, the Internet was mostly inhabited by people who wanted to do something specific, and were at least minimally invested - they had to actively use a computer to access things on-line. Nowadays, the Internet is inhabited mostly by people ready to judge you while sitting on a bus, because their phone buzzed them a notification that their friend retweeted a story about some stranger being outraged that some other stranger retweeted a link to your SE question.
I am tempted to think the amount I have used social media and my smartphone has actually declined since 2014, and in the case of facebook I suppose it considerably has, but I'm not sure I haven't just replaced it with other compulsive clicks. So in that sense I must agree things have probably escalated a bit, but I can't point to a single event over the past decade to create a turning point.
A main difference between {MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.} and {reddit, hn, chronological forums, etc.} is that the former heavily rely on following/friending (i.e, establishing your social network) while the latter do not. Thus, the latter are not "social media" in the sense of media existing in a social network.
Also, I find that when replying to something in the former I'm thinking about the person (I know them, in some sense) and what they said, while in the latter I'm thinking almost exclusively about what they said (I probably don't know the person). The latter lacks that social element.
What was once a bunch of individual sites, forums, chatrooms, etc., is now concentrated on a few companies (facebook, google, reddit,...), which are not that interested in content, but more into advertising and pleasing advertisers, and earning money, and advertisers, and ads and money, and less on their users.
This meant that everything had to be policitally correct (unless it was deemed acceptable to target a specific group), moderators got more powers, more thought bubbles and echo chambers... and now everything is going slowly downhill.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open...
I’m 37, but I look back at the internet I don’t really remember anything feeling like an overnight paradigm shift. But, revisiting moments like this buttocks post are like relics frozen in time — and I definitely feel like things are different and more streamlined in the internet now.
The internet became a streamlined hate-filled echo chamber so slowly that I never saw it happening.
I'm not sure what happened to SO, I can imagine their intent was to improve quality and reduce duplication - both bad for e.g. Google ratings or returning users. But the funny posts made it a living community. Removing the fun parts of a site like that makes it sterile.
I mean there's still e.g. codegolf, worldbuilding or the D&D spaces that are kinda funny sometimes.
For starters, it's incomplete. Yes, "some" people think humor itself is offensive. I would wager that there have always been some people like that, since humor itself was invented. How does that relate to what happened to Stack Overflow?
To make your answer complete, you have to connect the remaining dots, and there are multiple ways to do that. Thing is, none of those ways are "obvious".
For example, you could posit that the majority of people find humor offensive today, as opposed to 2014, but I don't see any evidence that's even true, much less obvious.
More likely, you're implying that the majority of people who have influence over Stack Overflow's tone consider the humor itself offensive. If that's obvious to you, it sure isn't to me.
Are you expecting a link to a scientific study proving it, or what?
.. is what I said. Why can't you just leave it at that?
Most of this thread is humorous, or trying to be. I don't see you answering every other post in it.
Interestingly, this never seemed to be a big deal with the old forums. The upvote system seems to really encourage a certain type of behavior (small low effort comments that lack substance).
Butfirst [2] I will refer you to my previous long thought-out comment about Sun Microsystem's dress code, the practice of "Skinnyhacking" [3] pioneered down the road at SGI [4], and the full names of the nude hackers involved [5], as well as a citation to the 1992 SIGGRAPH proceedings, and a link to a pdf of the paper [6] including a photograph of the Skinnyhackers in all their glory:
"Fast Shadows and Lighting Effects Using Texture Mapping", by Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, Paul Haeberli, Silicon Graphics Computer Systems. Computer Graphics, 26, 2, July 1992, Page 252, Figure 3: Simulating a Slide Projector.
[1] https://wrfranklin.org/Teaching/graphics-f2016/heckbert-rls-...
[2] https://fmslogo.sourceforge.io/manual/command-butfirst.html
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34129571
[4] https://rdtk.net/internet/how-do-you-check-a-computer-s-comp...
[5] https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.sgi.misc/c/X50cCoYrU20/...
Once upon a time we ruled this world…now we have become that disapproving aunt who thinks the world is going to hell because Johnny Carson let George Carlin talk about bad words on his show.
You have little to worry about as for puns taking over Hacker News.
anally retentive (adjective) [1]
Someone who is anally retentive is too worried
about being organized and tidy:
[1] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/anall...2. Draw the rest of the butt.