142 karma · joined October 10, 2018
Props on sticking to your guns for so long with cloth nappies, I know some couples who couldn’t make it work and felt they’d let themselves down.
This is great news for physics PhDs and the NIF machine is cool as hell, but it’s research to keep the US’s doomsday devices up to date. This does very little to stave off the other doomsday threat before us and nothing to justify the breathless reportage that it’s getting.
Violins have always been identified as being tuned in 5ths to the best of my knowledge, but the features mentioned above helped them out-compete other stringed instruments over a century when the fashion in music favoured those features.
Some of them are - the construction favours better projection over the kind of mellow sound of a viol, the rounded bridge allows for better virtuosic playing rather than chords. Music from the late 16th to the time of Monteverdi had a tradition of florid embellishments (diminutions) which favour a more responsive instrument, like cornetto, recorder or violin. The plague of 1630 in Venice is thought to be a major factor in the decline of the cornetto, so the violin had an opportunity to fill that gap then.
There’s also a change in the theory of harmony around this time from the Guidonian hand and hexachords to a more complete chromaticism. As someone’s already pointed out, fifths make for a very convenient arrangement of tones and semitones in order to play a scale. I suspect hexachords fit more naturally (!) across strings tuned to fourths - you would have ut-re—mi on the hard, soft and natural hexachords at your fingertips. As music theory moved away from this understanding of harmony, it would have also been more suited to the violin over the similar instruments tuned to fourths and thirds.
JET, ITER, Wendelstein and other magnetic confinement facilities on the other hand are investigating fusion as a source of grid energy.
[0] unless Mark Rober is involved in some way.
You may still personally consider this an overreaction, but please do not invite other people to that conclusion with incorrect data.
This is subject to carve-outs of course, but it would be interesting to see how PM seeks to achieve this.
The news this week is that the “Identify and Disrupt” bill has been passed to allow federal law enforcement to interfere with computer equipment in a way that deserves its own thread. [1][2] That bill was rushed through without time for members to read it [3]
[0] https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Hou...
[1] https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bi...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/aug/26/tony-...
[3] https://twitter.com/helenhainesindi/status/14304595485071441...
On online identities linked to passports - the US already asks this kind of in visa / ESTA applications [0]. It’s not currently mandatory to answer, but I get the impression that’ll change.
It’s hard to believe the line that any of this is directed to reducing online bullying, if anything it makes doxxing trivial. Law enforcement already has powers by warrant to do much of what this contemplates, and the rest is not somewhere I want Peter Dutton et al to be able to see.
[0] https://www.esta-online.com/blogs/esta-social-media-question
[0] https://www.eftposaustralia.com.au/news/eftpos-has-started-c...
Depending on the region, only a small fraction of payments are enrolled in the framework to do that validation / challenge anyway, it’s been expensive to adopt and a lot of card acceptors are still nervous about abandoned carts and lost revenue.
Aaaand that’s not to mention good old fashioned stolen cards, counterfeiting and at the other end, full-scale identity takeovers. Many security features are still bypassable by using the legacy system that should have been supplanted by now. It is a constantly-evolving (and frustrating) field.
In my experience, it’s an effort made to listen to people whose needs aren’t being met, because whatever policy or design is being discussed either forgot them entirely or designed something inappropriately. Easiest non-political example I can think of is an office bike locker where I worked which had hanging bike racks — as people started using e-bikes, that worked out badly, because e-bikes are heavy and the people using them didn’t all have the strength to hoist them. They weren’t the majority of cyclists, but they were causing the majority the problems of bikes being left in awkward or unsafe places. Turns out some regular cyclists struggled to lift their bikes too, so we installed floor racks (and power outlets) - clutter solved and back injuries hopefully avoided.
That effort to listen is definitely misused by some people who (in my respectful opinion) thrive on attention, but I think you’d find lefties talking about the project in terms of equality and inclusion.
OF has been increasingly making use of step-up authentication to avoid disputes, which is the way the non-US payments industry is heading. My guess would be that if disputes are in fact the reason, it’ll be because the step-up authentication isn’t available or working for some significant slice of the market.
That said, I don’t think that’s the reason. Switching off porn altogether means the vast majority(citation needed) of OF’s content will be gone, which means this has to be a life-or-death move. MC has been placing legality/consent/age restrictions on adult content, including real-time monitoring of content / chat [0]. My guess is that this is onerous enough that it breaks OF’s business model.
[0] https://www.webshield.com/post/mastercard-introduces-revised...