1,138 karma · joined December 2, 2016
It's a perfect standalone name, why ruin it? Maybe copyright/trademark issues?
For now. It can still go lower.
...if only the world was such a simple place...
But for non-production single nodes I just created a Dockerfile and deployed it because the other options were too much hassle. Can't remember the details, but in my (in)experience, deploying was always the hard part with Elixir.
I will need to try it again, it's been a while and the ecosystem has improved dramatically in the meantime ... and it was already excellent before. Good stuff!
I've been banging on this drum since AI's inception, and will continue do so.
Even if machines were capable of directly reading our mind and outputting a perfect representation of exactly what we wanted at the mere thought of it, it's still a mere tool bound by the creativity of its artist, even if the artist were the AI itself.
Art is dead. Art is always dead.
Did people complain when digital paintings became a thing?
And they are absolutely right.
GPT-4 is already much more than enough for 90% of tasks while maintaining a sane dose of human double-checking.
Making it faster enables real-time workflows, and better energy efficiency also gives them much more capability to serve more requests/users while lowering costs. And that knowledge likely carries over to GPT-5 or whatever.
> Now, if you’re wondering if I spent $99 to save some milliseconds for a meaningless demo, the answer is absolutely yes I did.
Godspeed, soldier.
> I was very excited for this problem in particular because it’s literally the perfect application of Elixir and Phoenix. If you are building conversational agents, you should seriously consider giving Elixir a try. A large part of how quick this demo was to put together is because of how productive Elixir is.
Back in the pre-GPT era I built a chatbot with LiveView, it is a a fantastic fit for assistants.
I might pick it up again, it was pretty fun.
My favourite was when I commented on a post on /r/art of a naked woman, replying to a guy who was complaining that only naked women got on the front page, to which I commented with “it’s very simple, naked woman = upvotes”. I was permabanned immediately after with no reason given, so when I asked what rule I broke, I was replied with - and I quote literally - “the one you didn’t read :)”. I still have no idea what rule I broke, if I even broke one.
Now, I could honestly not care any less about it, it was just an interesting interaction because of how unprofessional it was. It is kind of understandable, given that these guys don’t even get paid to moderate a very considerable influx of content, but still, it’s a very mild example of a larger problem that spans across the whole website. You have power tripping moderators that just do whatever they feel, some of them even banning based on what subs you interacted prior, regardless of content, and some of them even moderate hundreds, if not thousands, of subs. It’s insane. And yeah, any sub that has even the slightest hint of anything political is FUBAR.
It’s almost like the moderation never evolved past what I would expect from a niche joomla forum from the 2000 with hundreds of users… except now it’s one of the biggest sites on the internet. It’s quite bizarre.
Yes, that was a typo but I'm leaving it.
And it's not good songs either. It's bottom of the barrel, a penny a dozen kind of music if you know what I'm saying. They probably do this because it's cheaper than paying rights to play an actual radio.
Now, how the staff survives this kind of psychological torture, I don't know. What I do know is that both staff and the customers would be very glad to listen to anything else, including AI generated music. It's already miles better than some "music" we are subjected to... especially pop music, which is somehow more artificial than actual AI generated music.
There are a lot of places where I'd rather might want actual music, even if AI generated, instead of repeating the same sample over and over because you do not have enough budget to spend on it for something that is at least not completely irritating.
Unless you want the AI equivalent of this Family Guy sketch