296 karma · joined January 24, 2013
The 40% "wasted sunlight" doesn't have a cost—sure, yes, kind of besides the point—but it also generates no electricity. That efficiency is further compounded by reductions in incidence by latitude, cloud cover, and time of day. The diminishment thus could be quite serious on any given panel or farm.
This 2024 paper cites a 2016 paper about clouds and dusts that finds 10.4% reduction in efficiency when the relative humidity was 52.24% after two weeks. (The 2016 study is cited in footnote 184 under clasim 12). That's not a desert condition, I can assure you.
https://sustainenergyres.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s...
https://translate.kagi.com/?from=nl&to=en&text=MiJNHEER%2C+i...
They should really mass revoke that privilege because I can't see any upside to it. Unless they have a plan for some future state where they will want write access?
I take the message, provide the surrounding code, and it gives me a few approaches to solve them. More than half the time, the resolution is there and I can copy the relevant bit in the literal verbiage. (The other times it's garbage but at least I can see that this is going to require some AI—Actual Intelligence.)
[1] https://kagi.com/search?q=dana+white+5+rules&r=us&sh=-_lVctP...
Salesforce's view of this: lock-in.
I entered the move skeptical of Salesforce's value; I left impressed with the flexibility of the platform but aghast at the costs and development effort required to do much of anything. (I was also disgusted by the rough edges of its myriad acquisitions and their partial integration into the ecosystem—even after many years.)