bigyellow

You can believe whatever you'd like (no objective facts nor sources were provided, so they are assumed as irrational beliefs only), but you still can't refute the fact America lets people own firearms to defend themselves, while Canada does not recognize this human right.

USA because Canadians have fewer rights and can't even bear arms in defense of themselves.

Show me a source for this claim.

What's Meta? You mean Facecrook, the spying and surveillance network?

> On the other hand, what happens to population nutrition if cow’s milk was eliminated from the food supply?

It vastly improves as a result of lowered cholesterol, fat and hormone consumption.

How is that related to this article?

In capitalism, all costs of production are externalized. What you said is not relevant to the the importance and possibility of veganism.

You're telling me a for-profit, closed source, proprietary application store where anyone can submit software and call it anything they want has perverse incentives? I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

Let's definitely not put the name of the app in the title, so people are forced to visit our shitty site loaded with dozens of tracking domains and scripts.

The true derangement is using iOS in spite of abuse just to stay in touch with family and friends.

Why do animals need to be useful to humans to justify their existence to you?

Wow, this is one triggered ego! "I'm more important than animals because I said so!!!". Hilarious watching you throw this little tantrum.

Where is that definition from? I couldn't find it in DSM-5.

Also, why is the Census (or any collective action) more important than an individual's subjective view of privacy (or any private thought)?

Mr. Snowden is trying very hard to stay relevant. I guess posting family pictures didn't have the desired effect, so he's going for doomporn now.

> You cannot possibly blame the Chinese government or the people for the Corona virus. That's just insane.

Insane is what they do to animals in their so-called "wet markets". Take a look at some footage if you still have any respect left for the CCP.

About 50 Percent of Massachusetts COVID Hospitalizations Weren't Admitted for COVID

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/about-50-percent-of...

And this is only what they're being forced to admit.

Guy works at Facecrook for a decade and all he can muster is a selfish article about compensation and his precious "work life balance". Couldn't even say a few words about the ethical ramifications of this "contributions" to society by working there. No soul, no mindfulness, just pure ego.

> Also, I can't help but laugh at the notion of "mainstream media" as an insult. :D Like, "Oh, I don't trust those fools at the BBC, or the Reuters cabal.

Heh, wow you're so clever with your "laugh". It's not like the CEO of Reuters is also on the Pfizer board of directors ... oh wait ... that's exactly the case.

https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board_of_directors/...

Like 0.001% of the population understands EPA/DHA. If they did, the average IQ would be significantly raised, and we wouldn't be nearly as sick.

Imagine thinking Ivermectin is only "worshiped" by the "scientifically challenged". What an ignorant and stupid-ass thing to say, and the only reason for saying it is a consumption of crap from mainstream media outlet.

So there's no incentive for hospitals to over-count COVID cases, no federal money involved with inflated numbers, and no political motivation to artificially create a disaster? How nice it must be to live ignorant.

> It just means the vaccine does not reduce your chances of hospitalization by 100%. It is "only" reducing them by 90+%.

Oh we're just guessing numbers now? How quickly the discussion devolves into something other than science.

Quite easily the dumbest comment I've heard on HN. I hope it was sarcasm.

> hospitalizations in the 70+ population. That group is nearly 100% double vaccinated in Scotland.

Double vaccinated and hospitalized. Must mean the vaccine is working, right?

We're talking about Washington, a one-party state with extreme left politics. This is how it actually works:

Vaccinated person goes to the hospital for a cough and fever - "oh no dear, it can't be COVID because you're vaccinated, it must be the common flu" - not counted.

Unvaccinated person comes in for a wrist sprain, tests positive on the PCR - "OMG UNVAXXED HOSPITALIZATION" - probably counted twice, too.

Real inflation is like 20% in the US; none of us are retiring any time soon.

Funny we have to euphemise "nuggets" to suppress the true horrors and terrors of meat production. You're getting a chuckle because your brain is off.

This is hospitalizations WITH covid, not FROM covid - a totally useless metric.

Tell me you can't google "more vaccinated in hospitals"

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/19843315.covid-scotland-...

> Case rates lowest in unvaccinated as double-jabbed elderly drive rise in hospital admissions

Must be fake news though, right?

Exactly. We have no evidence of long-term effects, and are trusting the same people who told us a year ago that vaccines provide protection to tell us they're safe. It's asinine.