https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Valley_land_subsidence
408 karma · joined March 25, 2025
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Valley_land_subsidence
The permissions/security model should've expanded faster. There's huge benefits to being able to install arbitrary software and not worry about giving it access to everything.
But it would never cover everything to do with a computer.
Kinda wonder about the security implications. Seems like sharing the firmware/software is a good start. However: "Muse Home Link itself only runs official firmware and can’t be reflashed"
Feels like we'll get pervasive, instrumented smart homes very soon. And probably need a lot of security to go with it.
https://x.com/natfriedman/status/2106099384891158562: "We manufactured a batch of 5000 Home Links which should be ready to ship in a few weeks, and they are free for Muse subscribers while supplies last."
Huh? Seems like a disingenuous statement. I hope they update that sentence with something more accurate.
However, I've wanted much more granularity and pervasive permissions so I'm glad they're adding them.
Hong Kong: 0.75 meters/s (1.7 mph)
Kyiv: 0.9 meters/s (2 mph)
Kinda slower than I expected in general. I assume the speed is mostly dictated by boarding/alighting safety.
Oliver Bullough on Odd Lots podcast[0] talked about this issue recently (the large denominations). I guess he had a book "Everybody Loves Our Dollars" that went into this too.
I found the argument compelling but hopefully there's a balance to be struck at individual vs organizational scales.
Are there other photo types you've thought about taking? (I don't know very much about the topic. Rocket launches? Cruise ships? 360/Cylindrical line scan sweeps?)
I assume the train rails and constant motion are part of the appeal of making trains the subject. I can't exactly think of parallels, maybe a factory assembly line.
Between the guidelines + user thoughts (e.g. repetition, low novelty/new info), there's other reasons these types of replies might end up dead.
I am worried that it leads to people self selecting to other forums biasing the remaining userbase vote/vouch/flag distributions. In an exit vs voice situation, the voice kinda dies out. Then we end up other-izing people and homogenizing our communities.
But I concede it's also possible that the minority opinion issue could be the core driving force.
These comments don't stay up much anymore and I can't tell if it's structural to the forum (flag weight + statistical mechanics of votes + guidelines) or if it's the userbase sentiment.
I can't really intuit how I should think about when the model will be accurate. Is there somewhere to read more about that? I assume customers would just have some tests or talk to you.
It looks like the model takes as input a state (structured text? not sure if multi-modal) and a question (as a "Choice", "Score", or "Noul") with some additional augmentations possible. Then outputs the question's answers as appropriate (e.g. a choice, accompanying probabilities, confidence).
Edit: On the AI primer page, it looks like they do the RLCD on a pre-trained base model?
Not sure 'copying' is a clarifying explanation of what is happening though.
"factorization ran at no marginal cost on spare or fragmented compute that couldn’t be used for other purposes"
Interesting use of stranded compute.
Do you find this study to be accurate or inaccurate in any ways?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38728320/
Pdf seems available here: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Not-Everybody-Has-an-I...
I wonder why the scroll performance of every vibe coded app is the same kind of laggy. I assume they're defaulting to the same frameworks or implementations? Or the verification loops in training environments haven't prioritized frame rates/dropped frames yet.
Is it clunky in that it's a verbalized/languified version of system 2 thinking, and clearly humans do some non-verbal version too?
But I do understand that it's a little hard to characterize the amount of compute they're selling while obfuscating the business model enough that it still works. Demand, costs, supply, capabilities, competition change wildly week to week.
Selling a standardized "token" via the API with gas-like pricing works a lot better for transparency. But I think there's a world where the ambiguous subscription pricing is net beneficial for users and providers. Allowing some degree of price discrimination should benefit everyone in aggregate, assuming there's real competition and not yet another duopoly..
The mirror is missing the next post: "Compared to today, this works out to a 17% reduction in weekly limits on Claude Code"
When I submitted the story maybe 8 hours[1] after the announcement, it was already out of stock. This person says it sold out in 1 second - https://x.com/henry19840301/status/2090652363434647738 - if that's possible.
Some labs will be able to buy access. Not every platform will offer it. There are many more labs than the big ones.
Grok searching across x/twitter is too valuable to ignore or silo.
X is effectively a high signal comment layer for the entire internet + quasi internet (arxiv) + real world.
Same applies to any data silo I suppose, X just seems more straightforward to beachhead.
They're always so detailed I've wondered why he doesn't put a Table of Contents, among other editorial decisions..
For perspective - July 2026: 24.9%, All-time low (june 2023): 22.3%, 2008 Financial Crisis Peak: 34.8%, Covid Peak: 34.2%
The twitter and store page have a video of it. There's also a lite version without NFC/LoRa for $55.
1150mAh sounds similar to a kindle. I'm hopeful large programmable/touchable e-ink displays get mainstream soon..
Their store page seems most clear: https://shop.m5stack.com/products/m5papermono-with-lora-nfc-...
Introduces "Modular Cloud". In the keynote they say they've been serving models on openrouter under the name ModelRun.
Windows support for Mojo (that isn't via WSL).
Coincides with the open sourcing of Mojo.
The github[0] for it is kinda cool. Uses the 'CERN Open Hardware Licence Version 2 - Strongly Reciprocal'. The assembly instructions[1] give a bit of a hands on feel.
They had some more details on a reddit post[2] it looks like.
[0]:https://github.com/ploopyco/aplus-trackball
[1]:https://github.com/ploopyco/aplus-trackball/blob/main/docs/a...
[2]:https://www.reddit.com/r/ploopy/comments/1vo4y4r/this_is_the...
I love all I/O devices..
I think the main difference from the Ploopy Adept is they added two knob buttons?