http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
1,266 karma · joined May 25, 2009
anders norgaard on googles mail.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
A white-label, more configurable, plain ubuntu version of the pixelbook sounds like a dream.
Seems like a huge disadvantage for nuclear?
Also the fact that nuclear works best when outputting constant amounts of energy doesn't really seem to be an advantage - https://www.euractiv.com/section/electricity/news/german-nuc... ?
Sci-Hub As Necessary, Effective Civil Disobedience
http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/02/sci-hub-as-necessary-effect...
Like a gigafactory located close great land-wind resources?
Other forms of lying can also be illegal, however.
And Peter Suber has a good analysis here https://plus.google.com/u/1/+PeterSuber/posts/dU6tWcorZEV
Or maybe "Librarians in Germany, Peru and Taiwan to Rightfully Dump Elsevier Journals" ?
And most likely Olkiluoto 3 had a reasonable business case before the cost overruns. So the question is more or less: is the real price of nuclear the price that was hoped for Olkiluoto 3 or the actual price that will be paid? (maybe mostly by Areva and not TVO). The "strike price" of Hinkley makes me think that it is probably the latter.
And while the trends look favorable for solar and wind, they seem less favorable for Nuclear - cf.
Historical summary of EIA's LCOE projections (2010–2016) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source