285 karma · joined June 28, 2015
((military) citizens)
[0] https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/acs-5...
Restated, if you let the best LLM chomp on a task for 10 hours, the output becomes slop.
* These tasks are of the type that you spend 1% of your SWE career working on.
* Each task is primed with an essay length prompt.
* You must play needle in the haystack for bugs in 10 hours worth of AI generated slop.
My experience trying AI coding at work and my observations of AI evangelists makes me believe AI coding is exclusively the purview of people who willing to handhold an AI at half pace to achieve the same result while working on software which amounts to greenfield/toy problems.
The danger of LLMs to thought work is enormously overstated and intentionally overhyped. AI : StackOverflow :: StackOverflow : graybeard in basement
It would be cool if AI kills all thought work, but what will actually happen is a undersupply of SWEs and a second golden age of SWE salaries in like 15y.
Experts show saving 7.1337% at Walmart is worth losing your job to offshoring!
I haven't seen meaningful change for poor or workers with a decade of Democrat policy, so pardon me while I ignore that and vote for some tariffs.
Great times
What's weird is you pretending your model of the world is tied to reality when all it is tied to is ideology. Make bullying legal again.
I think it should be the opposite. Because I am superior, I should receive less punishment. Inferior people should receive more punishment so they are incentivized to become superior or disappear.
People have shorter lives, less children, lower IQ, lower income, less friends, less wealth, less homes, and less happiness. Your system is broken and your answer is more of the same.
This is the most disgusting thing I've read all week.
That makes sense. But say bread at $1(2023) is objectively worse than pasta at $1(2023); is there any way to account for that? It seems like a generic form of shrinkflation: without holding the basket constant, how do we know we are getting the same value?
To be fair, it could work the other way and the pasta at $1(2023) is better than the bread at $1(2023).
It isn't to say taking care of yourself has no value to you, but it is to say that no exchange of value happens.
> An investigation of median wages can be interesting. The comment only talked about wages in general
Looking at it I find my claim is false.
Median real wages have gone up (excluding the last 5 years or so). I could make an argument from inflation being wrongly calculated (due to stuff missing from the basket, or housing excluded, or shrinkflation, pick your poison) but I'm too stupid for that.
Comparing CPI (which includes housing) to median nominal wages over the past 5 years, it shows cost growth has exceeded wage growth. This though doesn't hold further into the past.
Your 62.5% labor force participation rate only aligns with the past if you completely discount women's unpaid and unaccounted work in the home and elsewhere. The male labor force participation rate has declined from around 90% to around 68%.
Thanks to our glorious new economy instead of basically everyone getting a house, spouse, and kid, now many will rent, work and die.