bdjsiqoocwk

What's the difference between UnionPay and Zelle?

This is where most things in the EU start, including the EU itself.

I like the high contrast actually, that aspect reminds me of gov.uk

And the tenth time they miss.

"requires human intervention every 13 miles" is a horrible metric, because it makes it sound it's not so bad until you remember that the moments for intervention are unpredictable and are also when you're just about to die.

What you're showing me is you don't know very many different people.

Only hard if you're that kind of person. Not everyone is like that. And those kind of people have difficulty believing this.

Anyone here know how it is in the UK? My kid will be starting school soon, and this terrifies me.

Yes. Because everyone is just repeating someone else's claims. This is what you get with a bunch of authority figures pretending to be scientists.

> He said he thought she had lost consciousness “within two minutes” and had died after five minutes. “We saw jerky, small twitches of the muscles in her arms, but she was probably already unconscious by then. It looked exactly how we expected it to look,”

It always leaves me feeling uneasy when I hear professionals use language like "it's probably alright".

It's the handwriting of the person who transcribed it, who was likely a professional.

> I call this begware

So disrespectful and so ignorant. You rely on free software without even knowing it but are happy to not dig around much and benefit from it. But heres a new project and you call it begware.

If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all.

I think in this context western isn't meant as the geographical term but as the cultural term. In that sense Poland is a very western country.

43% of men thought about Rome in the past 24 hours, there as to be something wrong with this, right? I'm very into Rome and I don't think about it 43% of the days, not even close. I'm guessing there's some selection bias going on in the way these people were sampled.

I love Julia, but what is your example trying to illustrate?

Well, the fact that Telegram wants to cooperate to me suggests that they previously could have been cooperating but weren't, which makes a charge of complicity make a lot more sense now. Thanks France!

> User data is a liability, not an asset.

Yeah Google and Facebook are all losing money in those liabilities.

No theyre not, they're printing money because user data is an asset. Stop repeating silly sound bytes.

Fines are discrimination against poor people, got it. They don't have those in wherever you're from?

The point is to stop them using highly polluting cars OR stop driving altogether OR something in the middle. So the person you're responding to is right. The "older people" were saying in a roundabout away that they'd rather stop driving than playing along by getting less polluting car. And the correct answer to that is indeed: "you've made your choice, that was the entire point".

The author is a committed amateur.

Dont these things have high labor per kilogram-kilometer costs? How would they ever be competitive? What am I missing?

Edit:

> Another study in Brussels looking at the operational advantages of cargo bikes over vans found that when you factor in insurance, maintenance, depreciation, and energy costs, vans have five to 10 times higher expenses per parcel.

I'm skeptical. I would imagine that the driver cost is the largest driver.

It's "tenet", not "tenant".

What's the mechanism behind that? Being "more fit" is not exactly one single thing.

Stallman is always right, if you're willing to wait long enough.

> Musk/X is for free speech

Can you say "cisgender" on Twitter now, or is it still banned?

It's not "critical". If Whatsapp vanished tomorrow it would get replaced by the next one so fast it would make your head spin. Not saying I can guess which one it would be, but one would win and people would carrying on with their lives just fine.

Random trivia about Ramses 2 (from memory, might be wrong): died at the age of 90, his 14th or something son inherited at the age of 70.

Concerning!

I'm just gonna leave a thought here...

Young people forget how contentious the idea that "tobacco causes cancer" was back in the day. The "circunstancial evidence" was overwhelming[1], so naturally the industry did all it could to muddle the water, in the shape of making money flow towards people who were already predisposed against targeting tobacco. So the thought is: since theres an industry profiting from UPFs, the same will happen around the debate on whether UPFs cause problems.

[1] because the evidence was almost always observational from which you cannot conclude causation, unlike with randomized controlled trials, like with UPFs. They mention to this in the article.

Well I'm just happy that people like you have no power.