barbazoo

If that means you need to at least be physically present then I'd say that's a lot of protection already. Means someone in a foreign country can't simply get lucky fuzzing.

Right, instead of just having more LLM conversations as they get faster and cheaper we'll find products having AI that never had it before.

How about an actually smart thermostat that checks the weather and possibly makes decisions more like a human would i.e. tool calling, judgement, preference, history, personal plans.

Sure we have thermostats and you can configure rules and data sources, hook up Google calendar, etc but it has to be all predetermined and breaks as soon as anything stops working. AI could make this less brittle. AI agents are more flexible.

Some are, and some aren't.

Are both optional in the same way? Where I live a child has a much harder time getting cigarettes than getting access to Facebook. What's the regulation here that applies to Meta you're thinking of?

> The judge found that Meta’s operation of Facebook and Instagram created a public nuisance which injured public health, safety, and welfare; and burdened public schools, hospitals, and law enforcement.

Hopefully one day this is what people think of when they hear people say "I work for Meta".

Still better than Meta having the money imo

With more wealth concentrates at the top, yes.

> “We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and have been transparent about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors and harmful content. We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,”

Laughable for anyone who's actually been on their platforms. There's been harmful stuff forever in ads, posts, marketplace, comments. It's so disingenuous, those people should be ashamed of themselves.

I love it. It makes me feel like I have super powers. I wish it wasn't so resource intensive.

What I mean is that I get the purpose of chat when the target audience is a small group of people that might have a reason to talk to each other.

Neuralink will hopefully filter that out client side /s

If your audience is more than a handful of people, what's the purpose of chat?

I can imagine that this will lead to an explosion in software where we didn't see software before. Much smaller business now have the ability to build something themselves, not with a team of highly paid software developers but a single programmer maune.

Big business is going to struggle with building software for a while. Writing code is often not the hard part there already, coordination, larger understanding of the system is I think.

Could you elaborate?

I thought Meta wants to put the burden onto the platform, i.e. Apple and Google, is what they are lobbying for.

https://pluribusnews.com/news-and-events/meta-lobbies-for-ap...

What is the institutional moat?

> As a result of today’s discussion, no UEFA national teams will participate in any FIFA competition for so long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances have been given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.

This seems to have actual teeth. What's Infantino going to do to save face? No one cares about a world cup without the Europeans.

We'll have to do both I imagine by the time we realize it's too late.

On top of that, direct electrification, what I'm thinking of for example is the electrification of how work is performed. A lot of oil and gas is used to spin a machine. Those use cases have to be electrified. That involves industry, commercial, infrastructure. That's where a lot of the energy savings will come from. From not having losses due to combustion.

I'm thinking learning something in that field might be an option.

That's a feature for me, not a bug. Not everything has to be everything-friendly all the time, especially if it makes it easier to consume content or stuff.

Edit: I'm forgetting about certain accessibility issues, although I'm not sure this plain page isn't a good fit for accessibility tools.

And it's so fast even with pictures. I miss the old internet.

Doesn't that depend on the sources of energy though? Pretty much constant short and mid term supply like geothermal, hydro, tides, etc vs unpredictable or variable in the short term like wind and solar.

As a society relying on solar, I'd want to have more of a buffer than one that relies on hydro.

I feel like we're entering an age of electrification so having training/education in a field related to electrics/electronics seems like a reasonable path for someone to take.

Right, as long as you can still get out.

I find such beauty in the fact that the robbers are getting robbed but it's all part of progress overall. It's not that China won't come up with what the US are coming up with. Just a matter of when it would happen.

> The people that... are the same people that...

Just stop. If you fund yourself starting a sentence that way, just close the browser.

> the two camps are

Or are those just the two ends of the spectrum? I don't know anyone on either extreme of the spectrum.

What's a good example you would say?

Maybe break down those numbers by income and you'll see that rich people are doing fine, everyone else not so much.

This is proof the US propaganda is working. How much damage has China done recently militarily?

Why so snarky? They included it in my plan "for free", I tried it, felt that it isn't worth the price at this point.

I'd expect the amount of money paid for exploits to go down then. It's inefficient to pay >$25 for an exploit that took $25 to make.

Max would be a 7x cost increase for me, I think it'd have to do a bit more than it does to justify that.