1,920 karma · joined January 16, 2013
You run into the problem where these todos never get touched because you don't know which are the loadbearing hacks, and tumbling down the rabbit holes won't help you get up to speed.
The only real way to combat this is to dedicate a small team to just start ripping things out/upgrading things/etc.
The only way to clear a minefield is to blow up all the mines....
Investors signal they approve of this strategy by continuing to invest in Netflix, despite not getting juicy dividends.
Netflix could massive reduce spend on OC and payout dividends, but that would be ultimately damaging to the long-term success of the company.
Actually if anything she was the primary driver of the plot. Freeman, being a passive mute, follows what Alyx and co are doing for the majority of the plot(s).
How any C level position blindly walks into this kind of thing in a post Cambridge-Analytica world is a different conversation.
Im kind of upset that they don't refer to it going forward as GUAC (as in guacamole)
What I never understood is why Exxon/BP/etc never positioned themselves to corner nuclear/solar/etc. At their level, pivoting from being a "Gas Company" to an "Energy Company" seems like a no-brainer. Who cares which energy source wins, if you own all the energy sources?
The only problem with little shenanigans is that its market manipulation- even if it appears to be legitimately accidental.
Where do you see this? Looking at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18157 it seems this kind of support is still not started
I hate, on a fundamental level this whole "bash in YAML" trend. Let's take a powerful, turing complete language and put it in a _config file_.
What? I don't even...
And the fact that you only get _one_ .gitlab-ci.yml file. That is legitimate madness. Want modularized CI/CD configuration? Not in these parts, buster. Have submodule build dependencies? We laugh at your use case.
Sure as shit better than Jenkins though.
Can you explain this a bit more? I thought the point was to have each service be as atomic as possible, so that a change to one service does not significantly impact other services in terms of rollbacks/etc.
If I'm wrong here let me know, our company is still early days of figuring out how to get out of the problems presented by monolith (or in our case, mega-monolith).
Nuclear is by far the lesser of the two evils, providing baseload level amounts of carbon neutral energy with nearly a century lifespan, highly regulated and being far, far safer than any competing energy source.
Also, near the end they get into black hole information preservation. What information are they referring to? My assumption has always been that black holes essentially zero out all information, like making all bits zero on a hard-drive.
SQL has decades of production maturation, and has wider domain knowledge.
The problem is space is big, and space is dark, so its hard to find things that don't generate their own light.
If there was a serious offer from some company where for the same amount of rent in SF, I could have a mortgage on literal acres of land, thats attractive.
Less attractive is the crumbling infrastructure, opioid wildfires, actual wildfires, and aggressively conservative culture.
Gotta try something though, right?