azeemba

People make typo's often and software can't always be sure if it should linkify something _just_ because it contains a dot. The definite way to be sure is people add the scheme `https://` or linkify the text using an app-specific way. Outside of that, every app has to make its own usability decision and some apps will correctly decide to ignore some unpopular TLDs for the sake of reducing annoyance.

The first time `age` is mentioned is halfway down in the article. `age` is only mentioned twice and both times as a reference to cite their usage of specific algorithms. I thought it would be more appropriate to cite algorithm choices of modern software written by security experts than me picking algorithms.

I also don't describe what `age` is and its use-cases. So I would have trouble calling that marketing.

Turns out, rational numbers are the classic example of a space that is not complete. A sequence of rational numbers can approximate pi but pi itself doesn't exist in the space (since its irrational). So the rational numbers that get closer and closer to pi form a limit to a value that's not in the space.

The original tumblr post linked to this wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_t... The initial conditions here are _not_ sufficient to pin to a unique solution.

> anything acting on it would violate other principles of classical mechanics

What other principles of classical mechanics does it violate though? I think that's the point of the exercise. To reflect on part of our mathematical modeling would prevent this.

People usually talk about planck length as some quantized length but it's just a scale where quantum effects are significant.

Edit: Looks like the post has been updated to point here. Just for completeness, it used to point to https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2023/08/05/nortons-dome...

I assume we can make mm-scale things. Considering that this 20um item is in the news and isn't powered, maybe mm scale is where the current limit is?

Web based graphics editor where the engine is written in rust. I think it uses tauri

I found it on reddit where some of the creators have shared some info: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/12rslm0/visualpde_ins...

The about page also credits the creators: https://visualpde.com/about/

The "bar" visualization is also nicer to track how close/far you are.

The seem to be using a markup format called [SBML](https://synonym.caltech.edu/).

> Many software tools and databases support SBML directly. You don’t write in SBML yourself—your software does it for you.

So its likely that you aren't supposed to parse/write the SBML directly. The BioModels website also provides PNGs so you can look at the state machines visually.

I wonder if gitea decided to become a company after they saw the interest from Blender. I know blender folks were asking questions about the long term future of the project.

For reference, here are threads asking for proposals on solutions to consider and announcement of gitea being picked:

- https://devtalk.blender.org/t/developer-blender-org-call-for...

- https://devtalk.blender.org/t/developer-blender-org-choice-f...

I don't think such a solution can work just based on the resulting image though. It probably needs to input prompt to have any chance of working.

But now it seems to go to the disambiguation page

If you are asking if the length of the password by itself be sufficient to create a secure password, then the answer is mostly no. You need many iterations of the hashing process otherwise brute force attacks become trivial given today's hardware.

There is a popular quote that related to this:

> The axiom of choice is obviously true, the well-ordering principle obviously false, and who can tell about Zorn's lemma?

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice

Axiom of choice, the well-ordering principle and Zorn's lemma are equivalent statements (any one proves the other two). But each has a very different "believability" feel to it.

Not all arguments between the individuals and the workplace translate because the workplace is a dynamic set of individuals. So any decision made for the workplace has to work for the people currently at work but also for future people you will onboard.

So if you can find out that one of your canary cards have been tested, you can have some confidence that your whole set has been compromised.

Do you mind sharing what browser/platform you are using?

It does remove the Microsoft Store and WSL with it which is important to me. Maybe a safer strategy is to look through that list and remove specifically the ones that are annoying

But this makes testing A in isolation difficult. When testing A, you want to mock out B with an instance the test can manipulate.

So we want A to not create B, instead we want B to be "injected" into A. The general strategy of having B passed into A is called dependcy injection.